Like I said, your a smart guy. I figured you would get it. I'm telling you what has been reported. If you know something specific about that contract, I've already told you I'm more then willing to consider it. Now, all you have to do is stop being more interested in acting the part and more interested in presenting the information about the contract that illustrates your point. As I have said, this is what was reported by ESPN. Not my assumptions. There is nothing at all honest about this statement and you and I both know it. It's fine, it is what it is but what it is not is you not trying to be confrontational. If you know so much about these contracts, as you claim, then it is you who should show us why what has been reported is not true. ESPN. I heard it being discussed on the Herd. So now, is the next thing out of your mouth how I didn't understand what was being said or that I am not educated enough to understand or am I simply flat out lying? Which will it be? Why don't you show us why what was said earlier is wrong? By all mean, if you are able, please do so. Now, you and all of the "rest of us" go ahead and think whatever you like. I'm certain I'll be OK.