It's intensely stupid actually to look at one stat that says Dak
might be good
in one element of his game and go IT'S ALL BS BECAUSE DAK NOT HAVE RING. It's just being loudly stupid
and proud of it,which is basically the root of everything wrong with this country, but that's a whole other topic.
For one, Dak could be great at everything
and still lose, because quarterbacks aren't magical win generators. They're one part of a greater whole. Did Aikman magically forget how to quarterback the second he got his 3rd ring? Most people would say no, the coaching was worse and the roster went into steep decline. Dude's a hall of famer (which nobody is calling Dak yet) and even he had limitations on how many team issues he could personally overcome.
For another, being good at one part of the game doesn't prove you're good at everything about the game. The stat might correctly describe this one part of Dak's game, but that's only a part of the whole; he could be failing elsewhere while being good at this part. But of course nobody Big Mad that Dak even exists is making the effort to have that conversation either.
Dak became so much better at this last year.
I’ve been watching several 2018 games lately and he was awful in this regard that season.
I think the line crapping out due to injury and giving up 56 sacks had
some role in that.