Rate Dak’s Performance

mrmojo

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,754
Reaction score
9,439
D- Im at a point where I have any confidence we will win a game in the playoff with him playing like this............he needs to practice yoga or something, his anxiety levels are through the roof at the start of games.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,054
Reaction score
84,636
Dak with a lead is really good.

Dak playing from behind is a bottom tier player.
 

Birch_Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
1,580
Once they were two scores ahead (almost immediately) we were in trouble. The pressure of trying to catch up did not work well for this team.
 

boysfanperiod

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,122
Reaction score
4,590
No, they didn’t.

0 takeaways (nice drop, Kearse) and couldn’t make a play when they absolutely needed it.

Cards chewed up lots of clock and converted 3rd down after 3rd down.

What game did you watch?
:laugh:

This team should have gotten blown out. They didn't. The defense played flat footed but they never gave up especially as long as they were out on the field for.

The fact that you called Kearse's name rather than Brown's says how well they actually did play.
 

dckid

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,770
Reaction score
2,486
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate our signal caller’s performance?
He is a good QB, who will go as the team goes.
Do I think he could have brought them back if they got the ball back.. yeah it’s possible.
 

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,743
Reaction score
4,383
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate our signal caller’s performance?

That was an 7/10 game from him.

This was a medicore to good defense he went against so nobody would expect him to be a factor at all. At least he had no brain AFKs.
He made a second read around the third quater. Somehting you dont expect from him.

Good game plan by Moore. Nothing more he could do with this QB.

So yes, good game for Daks standards.
 

McKDaddy

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,344
Reaction score
8,594
He's great guy and he is a leader.

Is he really a leader? How can we come out so sh1tty and with so many penalties against teams we seemingly have big advantages over? Wouldn't a leader be getting this under control?
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,034
Reaction score
6,463
He's lost to every playoff bound team he's faced this year. So there's that. C-
 

boysfanperiod

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,122
Reaction score
4,590
Is he really a leader? How can we come out so sh1tty and with so many penalties against teams we seemingly have big advantages over? Wouldn't a leader be getting this under control?

Some of the holds were tick tacky. especially when it benefitted us. You can't control a flag happy reffing crew.
 

kramskoi

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,387
Reaction score
1,765
If he can't win with the level of talent that surrounds him currently (on offense AND defense)...then WHEN exactly? Cedric Wilson almost bailed him out...just like Tony Pollard almost bailed him out against the Raiders. The same pattern...Denver, Raiders, Cardinals...slow start...faster finish but not nearly good enough.

This is going to be the knock on him until he puts it away. He can beat the cupcakes but good defenses bring him back to earth...with a thud.

As I said after the mass hysteria following last week, one game against a substandard and depleted team doesn't end a slump of some five or six games. I'm sure the excuses are going to be flying thick and fast...tonight, tomorrow and in the days that follow.
 

FVSTONE

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,609
Reaction score
2,693
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate our signal caller’s performance?
Average at best, there is something going on that we're not being told or he's doing some serious partying then showing up to up................
 

sillycon

Active Member
Messages
941
Reaction score
162
He's a 5 or 6. He's not terrible nor is he a game changer. But at 40 million, we need him to be at least an 8. He needs a 2016 level OL to maximize his output. Unfortunately, that looks to be long gone now...
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,813
Reaction score
16,969
This team should have gotten blown out. They didn't. The defense played flat footed but they never gave up especially as long as they were out on the field for.

The fact that you called Kearse's name rather than Brown's says how well they actually did play.
LOL why were they on the field for “so long”?

Because the Cards converted nearly half of their 3rd downs and 100% of their 4th downs.

And because we couldn’t force a single turnover.

That’s good defense in your world?
:laugh:
 
Top