Dak’s New Leg-Sleeve Tattoo

Status
Not open for further replies.

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
46,445
Reaction score
26,764
Yes everyone worries about what they look like when they’re 60 years old lol I never understood this stance. As a matter of fact there’s no guarantee he (or anyone) will make it to 60. Why worry about that now?
Funny thing is he will most likely look a lot better than these fat slobs who "hate tattoos and think they are stupid" when he hits 60.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
16,538
Reaction score
63,397
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
As someone with tattoos. The same way he feels right now. This isnt the 50s. The ink they use now stretches. Why is it the people that dont have tats are the first to judge the people with them?
No judgement at all. Just a question. Aren't you judging me by assuming I don’t have a tatto, assuming I’m against them, assuming you know anything about my feelings about that?
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,742
Reaction score
31,034
Funny thing is he will most likely look a lot better than these fat slobs who "hate tattoos and think they are stupid" when he hits 60.
Its always the people without tattoos that are the first to judge. Not realizing its not 1920 and tats aren't done with pen ink anymore. The ink they use now lasts a lifetime, doesn't fade or stretch. Its always the people with 0 clue who are the first to speak. Its comical.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,251
Reaction score
26,152
Yes everyone worries about what they look like when they’re 60 years old lol I never understood this stance. As a matter of fact there’s no guarantee he (or anyone) will make it to 60. Why worry about that now?
Sure. Maybe spend all your money today since tomorrow isn’t a guarantee.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,456
Reaction score
26,911
I think it is all stupid, full arm / leg / body tattoos....just stupid....but that is my opinion.
If that is what one wants to do, so be it....but I still think it is stupid.....
sort of agree but neck and face tats are far worse. they can effect you getting jobs and being judged etc im indifferent abut the tat thing but its tribute to thigs he ,uvs and soem of this in today's world is considered an art form, instead of Having it on wall, its on your body, to each their own,.

at least its not skulls, guns, blunt, naked woman, or creepy death and in bad tease type tats,
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,742
Reaction score
31,034
No judgement at all. Just a question. Aren't you judging me by assuming I don’t have a tatto, assuming I’m against them, assuming you know anything about my feelings about that?
I am not judging. I am coming to a conclusion based on your statement of "i wonder how he will feel about that in 40 years". No one with a tattoo would say that. Because it makes no sense.
 

Hawkeye19

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,161
Reaction score
21,241
whatever-zoolander.gif
 

EJK24

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,068
Reaction score
1,495
As someone with tattoos. The same way he feels right now. This isnt the 50s. The ink they use now stretches. Why is it the people that dont have tats are the first to judge the people with them?
If you're someone who doesn't like them, that's fine. Personal choice. I never walk around and wonder or question why people don't have them. It's amazing to me in 2023 people still ask questions like that or have issue with it.
 

Jipper

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,004
Reaction score
21,571
Tattoos used to be unique - now the opposite is true in terms of not having tattoos is unique. I would never do anything remote to that and personally i think it looks stupid but its his body and choice to do what he wants.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,916
Reaction score
22,440
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
confirms that he is a couple of cans short of a 6 pak ??:omg:
He could be studying game film, but heck who needs that when you can get a 10 hour tattoo??:facepalm:
You don't think other QB's find 10 hours in the offseason to do something besides study game film?
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,251
Reaction score
26,152
Its always the people without tattoos that are the first to judge. Not realizing its not 1920 and tats aren't done with pen ink anymore. The ink they use now lasts a lifetime, doesn't fade or stretch. Its always the people with 0 clue who are the first to speak. Its comical.
I have nothing against tattoos and I truly could not care any less as far as what people want to do to their own bodies.

I’m not sure how old you are, and the ink may very well not stretch, but I promise you that once you get to a certain age…your skin stretches. Gravity isn’t your friend either lol, pro athlete or not.

I promise you I have a long list of problems with Dak Prescott before we get to what his leg looks like at 60. I don’t care.

Peace.
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,742
Reaction score
31,034
I have nothing against tattoos and I truly could not care any less as far as what people want to do to their own bodies.

I’m not sure how old you are, and the ink may very well not stretch, but I promise you that once you get to a certain age…your skin stretches. Gravity isn’t your friend either lol, pro athlete or not.

I promise you I have a long list of problems with Dak Prescott before we get to what his leg looks like at 60. I don’t care.

Peace.
I said the exact same thing in a post above. Someone was upset he found 10 hours in the 3 months of offseason to do this instead of studying tape. I mean really?

You can hate the guy for his play on the field all you want. I do. But to bring tattoos into it as an argument for his dedication is a joke.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top