Micah abused our OL

Anyone who knows anything about football knows that the Packers DE is a special player. I'll appreciate his skill set from afar now that he is in Green Bay.

Great game plan by the Cowboys offense. Great execution by the Cowboys QB1 as well.
He isn't LT or Reggie white. Never has been or will be. Taking nothing away, he is good at what he does when the odds are in his favor
 
I agree with you.
Thunderpimp's #59 response that mentions the impact on the play/result of the play should be a part of the PFF metric not limited to snap of the ball activity.
Unless the player influences that play, it should not be considered that important. Win rate if you do not pressure or sack the QB or even get a hit on him means NOTHING.

I bet DeWare had a top win rate in his prime but what did it get us?
 
Micah did play much better than some here give him credit for.

But to give example #1001 of how silly (and opinion-oriented) PFF can be, they gave Micah the highest grade (94) this weekend of any player on any team--offense or defense.
 
Unless the player influences that play, it should not be considered that important. Win rate if you do not pressure or sack the QB or even get a hit on him means NOTHING.

I bet DeWare had a top win rate in his prime but what did it get us?
Totally agree.
 
You are the one not paying attention. We ran the ball right at him in our first possession. We wore him down with JWilliams and making him rush outside, not allowing him inside. Later in the game, we blocked him with just a tackle, no help.
LOL.

You watched a different game. Maybe even a different team then.
 
Micah did play much better than some here give him credit for.

But to give example #1001 of how silly (and opinion-oriented) PFF can be, they gave Micah the highest grade (94) this weekend of any player on any team--offense or defense.
Yeah,
that's just ridiculous.
It's rewarding empty calories.

Yeah,
so then Dak's 84 PFF grade while personally defeating all of these Micah pressures should be 10 points less than Micah's.
Makes perfect sense.
 
Last edited:
You are the one not paying attention. We ran the ball right at him in our first possession. We wore him down with JWilliams and making him rush outside, not allowing him inside. Later in the game, we blocked him with just a tackle, no help.
Simply not true. Yes the very first play of the game they ran it Michas way for a 3 yard game, but on that drive they ran the ball 3 times and only once was it in the direction of Parsons. Not exactly what I would call wearing him down early with the run. 2nd possession was

Q1 - 4:14 - Pass - Tolbert motions in to chip Parsons
Q1 - 3:13 - Pass - Tolert motions over to chip Parsons
Q1 - 2:07 - Pass - 1v1 matchup Parsons/Guyton

Even later in the game I'm not seeing what you're talking about. To start the 4th quarter we have

Q4 - 11:34 - Pass - Guyton/Smith double Parsons
Q4 - 11:03 - Run - Toss away from Parsons
Q4 - 10:22 - Pass - Micah lined up over Hoffman - chipped w/ RB
Q4 - 9:51 - Run - end around to Turpin - Micah doubled with Schoon and pulling Guard
Q4 - 9:18 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Guyton
Q4 - 8:35 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Guyton - gets quick pressure and forces the ball to come out early for incompletion
Q4 - 8:31 - Pass - Parsons chipped from RB
Q4 - 7:06 - Pass - Schoon chips Parsons before running his route.
Q4 - 1:38 - Pass - Parsons chipped by RB
Q4 - 1:35 - Pass - Parsons chipped by Ferg
Q4 - 1:13 - Pass - Parsons 1V1 w/ Steele (Pretty good job by Steele tbh)
Q4 - :50 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Steele - quick pressure from Parsons, but Dak gets the ball out in under 2 seconds


So to start the game we literally ran the ball at Micah one time.
In Q4 we had:
  • 2 run plays, one away from Micah
  • Doubled or chipped him on 7 of 12 snaps
  • Of the 1v1s Micah won half of those matchups
 
Micah did play much better than some here give him credit for.

But to give example #1001 of how silly (and opinion-oriented) PFF can be, they gave Micah the highest grade (94) this weekend of any player on any team--offense or defense.
They aren't biased.... Much
 
Micah.

The king of these types of stats, but invisible when watching the games.
The highlights are
Simply not true. Yes the very first play of the game they ran it Michas way for a 3 yard game, but on that drive they ran the ball 3 times and only once was it in the direction of Parsons. Not exactly what I would call wearing him down early with the run. 2nd possession was

Q1 - 4:14 - Pass - Tolbert motions in to chip Parsons
Q1 - 3:13 - Pass - Tolert motions over to chip Parsons
Q1 - 2:07 - Pass - 1v1 matchup Parsons/Guyton

Even later in the game I'm not seeing what you're talking about. To start the 4th quarter we have

Q4 - 11:34 - Pass - Guyton/Smith double Parsons
Q4 - 11:03 - Run - Toss away from Parsons
Q4 - 10:22 - Pass - Micah lined up over Hoffman - chipped w/ RB
Q4 - 9:51 - Run - end around to Turpin - Micah doubled with Schoon and pulling Guard
Q4 - 9:18 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Guyton
Q4 - 8:35 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Guyton - gets quick pressure and forces the ball to come out early for incompletion
Q4 - 8:31 - Pass - Parsons chipped from RB
Q4 - 7:06 - Pass - Schoon chips Parsons before running his route.
Q4 - 1:38 - Pass - Parsons chipped by RB
Q4 - 1:35 - Pass - Parsons chipped by Ferg
Q4 - 1:13 - Pass - Parsons 1V1 w/ Steele (Pretty good job by Steele tbh)
Q4 - :50 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Steele - quick pressure from Parsons, but Dak gets the ball out in under 2 seconds


So to start the game we literally ran the ball at Micah one time.
In Q4 we had:
  • 2 run plays, one away from Micah
  • Doubled or chipped him on 7 of 12 snaps
  • Of the 1v1s Micah won half of those matchups
You are doing the lords work. It won't matter to the intended audience but I appreciate this breakdown.
 
Simply not true. Yes the very first play of the game they ran it Michas way for a 3 yard game, but on that drive they ran the ball 3 times and only once was it in the direction of Parsons. Not exactly what I would call wearing him down early with the run. 2nd possession was

Q1 - 4:14 - Pass - Tolbert motions in to chip Parsons
Q1 - 3:13 - Pass - Tolert motions over to chip Parsons
Q1 - 2:07 - Pass - 1v1 matchup Parsons/Guyton

Even later in the game I'm not seeing what you're talking about. To start the 4th quarter we have

Q4 - 11:34 - Pass - Guyton/Smith double Parsons
Q4 - 11:03 - Run - Toss away from Parsons
Q4 - 10:22 - Pass - Micah lined up over Hoffman - chipped w/ RB
Q4 - 9:51 - Run - end around to Turpin - Micah doubled with Schoon and pulling Guard
Q4 - 9:18 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Guyton
Q4 - 8:35 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Guyton - gets quick pressure and forces the ball to come out early for incompletion
Q4 - 8:31 - Pass - Parsons chipped from RB
Q4 - 7:06 - Pass - Schoon chips Parsons before running his route.
Q4 - 1:38 - Pass - Parsons chipped by RB
Q4 - 1:35 - Pass - Parsons chipped by Ferg
Q4 - 1:13 - Pass - Parsons 1V1 w/ Steele (Pretty good job by Steele tbh)
Q4 - :50 - Pass - Parsons 1v1 w/ Steele - quick pressure from Parsons, but Dak gets the ball out in under 2 seconds


So to start the game we literally ran the ball at Micah one time.
In Q4 we had:
  • 2 run plays, one away from Micah
  • Doubled or chipped him on 7 of 12 snaps
  • Of the 1v1s Micah won half of those matchups
"Won" is winning in the eye of the beholder? Please if I may, can you show your work? Because to most fans when they observe a player whipping there man, the end result is usually not the opposing team putting up a 40 burger. Just saying.
 
The highlights are

You are doing the lords work. It won't matter to the intended audience but I appreciate this breakdown.
Oh boy. Now it's the Lord's work? Lol. Pretty sure our Lord doesn't care about football or what Micah did or didn't do. I'm not trying to be difficult. I guess I'm from a different era where winning by a player meant they dominated there man and got a win, and everyone knew it. Didn't need to be explained in great detail, it was just known.
 
"Won" is winning in the eye of the beholder? Please if I may, can you show your work? Because to most fans when they observe a player whipping there man, the end result is usually not the opposing team putting up a 40 burger. Just saying.
This is silly. It's a team sport and there are limits to the impact a single player can have. The Steelers gave up 32 in regulation to the Jets. What does that say about TJ Watt? The Browns gave up 40 to the Ravens. What does that say about Myles Garrett?

Parsons won is matchups a high rate. The Cowboys moved the ball despite that. Both of those things can be true.
 
Unless the player influences that play, it should not be considered that important. Win rate if you do not pressure or sack the QB or even get a hit on him means NOTHING.

I bet DeWare had a top win rate in his prime but what did it get us?
Why would we grade an individual player for team results though? If an O-lineman makes his block but the RB makes a bad read and hits the wrong hole do we mark that as a bad play for the OL? Is anyone expecting Zay Flowers to go out and put up 100+ yards this weekend if Lamar Jackson doesn't play? No, because results are dependent upon all 11 guys on the field.
 
He isn't LT or Reggie white. Never has been or will be. Taking nothing away, he is good at what he does when the odds are in his favor
Plenty of HOF players aren't the two you named. DWare and Charles Haley weren't them either. So what? If you are a great player, you are a great player. The kid is a great player. Whether we like him, root for him, or not.

He's a great player on another team just like LT and The Reverend. Not rooting for him like I didn't root for them. But, when he makes a play I will still be amazed by his skill. Just like I was with Derrick Thomas, Aaron Donald, Bruce Smith, etc.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
475,026
Messages
14,577,102
Members
24,214
Latest member
whoami2066
Back
Top