Right. Of course it is debatable. Any "best ____" is debatable a greatmajority of the time.I honestly believe that Emmitt is the better running back but it most certainly is debatable. Emmitt gets volume, it's that adage "availability is the best ability". It is why he is the "Jerry Rice of RBs" and there is nothing wrong with that.
However, Barry averaged 18.7 more rushing yards per game over both of their careers. As per the receiving comment, Barry actually averaged more receptions, yards, and TD per season than Emmitt so I am not sure where you are getting the catching the ball part. As for TD's, Barry averaged 9.9 per season while Emmitt 10.9 - hardly a "couldn't touch" number.
![]()
![]()
Kind of random but it's the off season and I thought this was cool.
Every running back would have done that if they could.Emmitt holds all major records because he spent the last four or five years of his career padding his stats. He made no secrets his goal was to break Walter Payton's record. He didn't care much about winning as getting the record.
That's where he lost me a little bit. Also one of the reasons why Bill Parcell didn't want him to play for him. So as far as him holding all the major records I give you that but not the best pure running back.
Yep, it's like saying is Randy Moss better than Jerry Rice?Not debatable at all. Emmitt holds all the major records. He's the Jerry Rice of RBs. Hell, he's arguably beyond that (see the 1000+ first downs NFL record above).
And before you say, "if Barry didn't retire..." that is a what if argument that you can't know how it turns out. Perhaps Barry gets injured and has to retire the very next game.
Also, Barry couldn't touch Emmitt when it came to scoring TDs, catching the ball, and blocking.
I tell people that all the time. For the very same reason we acknowledge Jerry Rice as the GOAT, we must acknowledge Emmitt Smith as the GOAT. Multiple MVP winners, multiple SB championships, all time leaders in touches, yds and TDs. Neither were the strongest, fastest or fanciest player at their position but simply were the greatest FOOTBALL PLAYERS at their respective positions.Not debatable at all. Emmitt holds all the major records. He's the Jerry Rice of RBs. Hell, he's arguably beyond that (see the 1000+ first downs NFL record above).
And before you say, "if Barry didn't retire..." that is a what if argument that you can't know how it turns out. Perhaps Barry gets injured and has to retire the very next game.
Also, Barry couldn't touch Emmitt when it came to scoring TDs, catching the ball, and blocking.
This, Barry OL had 2 all pros on it (for the ones that always say what he would have done with our OL), heck some all time great RB’s didn’t have one all pro on it.I don;t think Sanders hit the hole like Emmitt did. Barry's lioine, offense, and team were not as bad as some people believe, because they watched Barry *decide* to dart around. It was entertaining for sure....but Emmitt was not afraid to dig in..."north and south" instead of squiggles.
YES! THANK YOU! Good to know someone has the facts.This, Barry OL had 2 all pros on it (for the ones that always say what he would have done with our OL), heck some all time great RB’s didn’t have one all pro on it.
Definitely not the case. He lost yards because of too much dancing in the backfield instead of hitting the hold.YES! THANK YOU! Good to know someone has the facts.
"Everyone" seems to need to believe his O-line was awful...just not the case.
And he was leading the NFL in rushing at the time. That hand injury was a major factor in him not winning the rushing title in 1999.Yep, he had 140 yards and seemed to be destined for a historic game. One of the great what if's.
And this was 30-year-old Emmitt, after everybody said he was washed up and after most of his supporting cast from the Super Bowl years was gone.He was gonna break 300 that day in my opinion. I was certain of it until the injury. The Vikings simply couldn't stop him at all.
Well Parcells did have Hambrick!Emmitt holds all major records because he spent the last four or five years of his career padding his stats. He made no secrets his goal was to break Walter Payton's record. He didn't care much about winning as getting the record.
That's where he lost me a little bit. Also one of the reasons why Bill Parcell didn't want him to play for him. So as far as him holding all the major records I give you that but not the best pure running back.
LOL.....and what does that say about what he thought of Emmitt?Well Parcells did have Hambrick!
How funny was it that he ended up being Emmitt's backup again with the Cardinals?Well Parcells did have Hambrick!

