The fallout from the Micah trade feels a bit like Herschel

you could also say it led to bye bye eberflus, and Jerry letting shotty hire a new DC which led to parker.
I thin Parker was the most important move of the off season.
If eber were still here players selected would be different, and my outlook would ho hum.
Having Micah for all of last season wouldn't have moved the Cowboys defense much at all! He would've been double teamed and taken out of most games and then his frustration would have shown! Getting him and Diggs out of the locker room is a huge move for the Boys!
 
Holy Larry, that head injury springing up again. Once again, you are completely incapable of any sort of response. You do nothing on this site but get owned. I've never seen you own even one single poster. Pathetic, dude, pathetic.
Now it’s ’pathetic’ coming from the guy who says Eberflus wasn’t the problem. :lmao2:
 
I definitely think the Parsons trade could work out. But it was never a strategy from our ownership to rebuild defense. That was all sold narrative after the negotiations failed.

And why I can’t give any credit to Jethro. If it works out then he’s benefited or fell into it after the fact. And made the most of it.

The key will be how many years it takes to fully culminate into the results we are looking for as the window won’t stay open long on this QB and offense,
 
Having Micah for all of last season wouldn't have moved the Cowboys defense much at all! He would've been double teamed and taken out of most games and then his frustration would have shown! Getting him and Diggs out of the locker room is a huge move for the Boys!
Not at all. People keep glossing over the fact that we were 28th in 2023 w/ Parsons. Guess it doesn't fit their agenda!!!
 
This maybe wasn't a Grand Slam but it was a Home Run for the Cowboys! Micah was great at rushing the passer and not so good against the run as he didn't hustle on non-passing play most of the time. The Cowboys defense is a far more complete unit a year later after trading him so yes, I'd rather be right where we are!!
In Parson’s defense he was asked to do mainly 1 thing, rush the passer.
 
So they told him “nah, don’t worry about the runner coming to your side, we’re good”. I highly doubt that.
What he meant to say is Micah lined up on the Edge a majority of the time he was on the field (in order to get to the QB), but a good Edge can not only rush the QB, they can also stop the run
 
Would you rather have.....?

Micah Parsons

or

Kenny Clark, Quinnen Williams, Malachi Lawrence, Rashan Gary, and Ottito Ogbonnia

That's what the trade and subsequent offseason decisions essentially brought with the money Micah wanted.

And it provided the depth to make the Osa trade possible that brought Barham.

It may be early, but this has shades of the Herschel Walker trade about it.

Best offseason roster management we've seen around here in a long, long time.
Last year we would have been better off with Micah. All I heard was, If we only had a decent defense. Well we did have a decent defense with Micah.
 
I’m happy with the deal. I’m not at all happy about how it all went down (terrible look for the organization, but Jerry doesn’t care), but the team on the field is overall better off.
Typical of a good portion of the world that seems to think appearances really matter. When it's all said and done it's the substance that matters rather than a fanbase getting their feeling hurt.
 
I don’t get the math by the OP. Why does it have to be Micah or those 5 players? Why does we let Jerry off the hook for not going hard for a guy like Q while you still have a Micah Parsons?i
And keeping Tank.
 
Typical of a good portion of the world that seems to think appearances really matter. When it's all said and done it's the substance that matters rather than a fanbase getting their feeling hurt.
It's not about hurt feelings. It's about professionalism.
 
Last year we would have been better off with Micah. All I heard was, If we only had a decent defense. Well we did have a decent defense with Micah.
End then make the playoffs and one and done. And that’s a maybe. And then we don’t get Q and lose out on Caleb. And Eber might not have gotten fired.
 
I don’t get the math by the OP. Why does it have to be Micah or those 5 players? Why does we let Jerry off the hook for not going hard for a guy like Q while you still have a Micah Parsons?i
I don’t know about the OP but I think we already know that Jerry wouldn’t have done any of those things, whether he could have or not.
 

Staff online

  • Sarge
    Red, White and Brew...

Forum statistics

Threads
475,026
Messages
14,577,157
Members
24,214
Latest member
whoami2066
Back
Top