- Messages
- 68,321
- Reaction score
- 77,936
Fortune-telling answers for some possible follow-up questions...No, I did not care about redzone conversions, touchdowns, etc.
Red zone scoring too!
Fortune-telling answers for some possible follow-up questions...No, I did not care about redzone conversions, touchdowns, etc.
Red zone scoring too!
That's why love the fact that we have a great kicker FG fest 2026 coming soon baby!!!!!!!!From a basic search:
The Dallas Cowboys finished the 2025 NFL season with a red zone touchdown percentage of roughly 45.5%, which placed them among the bottom tier of the league.
Dallas has been middle of the pack in redzone efficiency for years....
tell us now!!!!!There is only one way to improve this offense in the playoffs ....... and everyone knows what that is.
Overton?Our LT can’t pass block.
Excellent post my friend. There are far too many assumptions made that all this team needs is a better defense.I have a feeling I probably read another member like @Bobhaze, @xwalker, etc., having already posted this or something similar, lol. However, I thought it was worth looking at how well last season's offense assisted its pathetic defense in terms of keeping drives alive and controlling time of possession.
For that reason, I compared whether Dallas' third-down conversion rate in each game was above or below its season average. The same was done for each of its opponents. Dallas' overall record for each situation is also noted.
[Fortune-telling answers for some possible follow-up questions: "-FD" columns are totals for third downs converted successfully by rush, pass, and penalty. No, I did not care about redzone conversions, touchdowns, etc. No, I did not care to do the same for all Dallas opponents' 2025 games for comparison. The answer is likely no for other questions too.]
Sources: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2025/#all_team_conversions, stathead.com
Both teams' offenses performed at or above their average third-down conversion rate (Dallas record 5-4)
Week Dallas-3D% Opp Opp3D% Result Rsh-FD Pass-FD Pen-FD 1 63.6@PHI 61.5L 20-24 7 9 6 2 42.9NYG 42.9W 40-37 (OT) 8 18 6 5 46.2@NYJ 43.8W 37-22 9 12 1 6 41.7@car 37.5L 27-30 1 12 2 7 50.0WAS 43.8W 44-22 7 11 3 9 41.7ARI 53.8L 17-27 8 14 0 12 41.7PHI 41.7W 24-21 6 16 3 13 56.3KAN 38.5W 31-28 3 15 5 16 44.4LAC 63.6L 17-34 4 13 1
Both offenses performed below their season average 3D conversion rate (Dallas record 2-2)
Week Dallas-3D% Opp Opp3D% Result Rsh-FD Pass-FD Pen-FD 11 40.0@LVR 25.0W 33-16 7 16 1 14 40.0@DET 37.5L 30-44 7 17 1 15 16.7MIN 22.2L 26-34 12 12 1 17 40.0@WAS 16.7W 30-23 10 13 5
Dallas offense performed below their season average 3D conversion rate & their opponent's offense performed above their season average 3D conversion rate (Dallas record 0-3-1)
Week Dallas-3D% Opp Opp3D% Result Rsh-FD Pass-FD Pen-FD 3 27.3@CHI 57.1L 14-31 6 14 3 4 36.4GNB 71.4T 40-40 (OT) 8 17 1 8 36.4@DEN 62.5L 24-44 8 12 4 18 25.0@NYG 57.1L 17-34 9 8 1
Dallas offense performed above their average 3D conversion rate & their opponent's offense performed below their average 3D conversion rate (Dallas record n/a - never happened) < Methinks this is the worst indictment of the four situations and solely against the defense last season, in my opinion. No help at all, despite any particular game when the offense had been executing well.
i think he means putting up curtainstell us now!!!!!
When this team sees improvement at offensive tackle you will get the improvement on offense that we all desire to watch. Offensive tackle play must improve, pass blocking is weak on both sides with Steel and Guyton. A good free agent tackle is still a need big need and would help considerably.Excellent post.
The prevailing topic all offseason was about improving the defense, for good reason. The offense in 2025 was very good, but far from perfect. Some things need to improve (including red zone efficiency as well) for this team to get where they need to go.
Good post, Tyler Booker is listed at 6-5 330, Booker played well last year, and this year should be stronger. So, if Dallas can get some better play at both offensive tackle spots, winning TOP could very well be a possibility more often this season. Dallas is strong on the interior but weak at tackle with Steel and Guyton. How good is Decker with the Lions could he help, what would he cost this season if Dallas signed him.Wouldn’t mind seeing them get back to where they are outstanding at winning TOP, as they were with Murray and early Zeke. That ought to help the new defense be more effective sooner than later.
Yeah…..like 400 things need to go right, but it’s not as if there’s a feeling of zero chance. Probably why I rate JWill as a player that should rank high on the ‘would be missed’ list. If he somehow is lost at any point before the deadline, they will likely have to make a trade. Even if whatever Blues problem actually is rectifies itself, he probably can’t fill that role.
I stated the premise as:So the premise is the Dallas offense needs to get better, but the basis/proof for that uses the performance of last years putrid defense as part of the metric?
...and I never categorized my comments as 'proof'. They are an opinion only. My opinion is that an offense, whether its companion defense is ranked 32nd, 1st, or anywhere in between, must keep its drives alive and control TOP.However, I thought it was worth looking at how well last season's offense assisted its pathetic defense in terms of keeping drives alive and controlling time of possession.
Gracias.But I found it interesting, so thanks for taking the time and posting it.![]()
LT is a 1st round bust.So the premise is the Dallas offense needs to get better, but the basis/proof for that uses the performance of last years putrid defense as part of the metric? That really doesn't prove anything unless I'm not understanding. If this year's Offense is exactly the same as last years and this years defense is much better than last years then if I am understanding the stat being used, when both perform above their 3rd down conversion rate, we likely have a better record. Plus it is using one stat as the basis for projecting out a record when it isn't that simple. it ignores turnovers, big plays TDs vs FGs (you did mention Red Zone performance) and many other stats that could be used to come up with maybe a similar outcome or maybe a very different outcome. Point being maybe it means something and maybe it doesn't but most likely there is nothing more than a correlation. But I found it interesting, so thanks for taking the time and posting it.![]()
Did WE...ever..."score too fast"?It’s like the offense was getting the ball back, more often, because the other team
was scoring so fast
I was trying to find time of possession for the offense compared to other opponents defenses
It can't be just "overall".Yeah, if you watched every game last season you don't even have to see those numbers. The offense definitely had its share of hiccups and bog-downs. That said, overall, it was pretty good. Hard to ask it to much more, but I will and we should.
