Twitter: Dak Prescott owns the NFC East

[TheMarathonContinues]

Funny, I just rewatched Dak's best playoff game - The Buccaneers where he may have thrown 5 TDs.

The first 5 minutes of the game he was deer-in-headlights Dak. CeeDee had one legit drop, but after that Dak went high, low and off. Aikman said, "Man Dak is still a little jittery in the pocket..." after 7 offensive plays and most of them passes.

It was Tony Pollard who saved Dak's bacon and opened up the game. If it weren't for the fact that the team we were playing was not very good, we lose that game too.

This what happens when you suffer DDS.,..you debate Dak so long you’ve now officially argued against yourself and lost lol.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

This what happens when you suffer DDS.,..you debate Dak so long you’ve now officially argued against yourself and lost lol.

Hilarious. Isn’t it?

 

[DandyDon52]

You've made alot of great points about the Cowboys having mediocre to not very good HCs and defenses for lots of seasons. I wonder why those particular issues were conveniently left out of conversations when talking about the Dallas Cowboys for over a decade.

You let some people tell it, we've had HOF coaching on the level of Reid or McVay or something or great defenses who were GOOD vs the running game for years or something.

Fans tend to ignore HC etc, and Front office, and they focus on the players more.
I felt that losing to GB in 2014 and 2016 was JG fault as he made some glaring errors, and he surely didnt help things. Plus we had marinelli on def didnt we those 2 years?

Then MM comes along and he was good during reg season, but nothing extra for the playoff games, and he even hindered the team. and again some bad defenses along the way.
I think they lost in 2018 to rams? when they ran for 280 yds ?

Curious to how shotty does in playoff games, cant be much worse.

 

[ratkinson]

Fans tend to ignore HC etc, and Front office, and they focus on the players more.
I felt that losing to GB in 2014 and 2016 was JG fault as he made some glaring errors, and he surely didnt help things. Plus we had marinelli on def didnt we those 2 years?

Then MM comes along and he was good during reg season, but nothing extra for the playoff games, and he even hindered the team. and again some bad defenses along the way.
I think they lost in 2018 to rams? when they ran for 280 yds ?

Curious to how shotty does in playoff games, cant be much worse.

Yes it can.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Criticism is one thing. But extremes that aren’t true are another. Can you please explain what scheming Dak did? He did what 99% of other players do. If I missed something shady he did, please let me know.

Are you serious? Dak had a contract ready to go back in 2020/1, but 3 games he was lighting up trash teams and then told Jerry, “Nah…we’re gonna wait this out.” So all the people who blame Jerry for not signing Dak sooner it was because:

1. Dak did not want to sign unless he was the highest paid (“for the brotherhood”)
2. Jerry did not believe Dak was worth it and said it to his face when he signed him
3. The MAIN sticking point was not money but YEARS: How many times can the pig return to the trough and stuff its fat guts? The more times a player can come back for more money - especially having no option to franchise tag - you can run up the bill. Dak and his agent are going to be back at the trough NEXT YEAR - having done NOTHING to earn his current contract …which is freaking hilarious.

OR you can do what WINNERS like Brady, Mahomes and Brunson did - give some of that money back in exchange for a trophy or ring.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Yes it can.

How can not making the playoffs get any worse?

 

[big dog cowboy]

Fans tend to ignore HC etc, and Front office, and they focus on the players more.

Not in here.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

You've made alot of great points about the Cowboys having mediocre to not very good HCs and defenses for lots of seasons. I wonder why those particular issues were conveniently left out of conversations when talking about the Dallas Cowboys for over a decade.

You let some people tell it, we've had HOF coaching on the level of Reid or McVay or something or great defenses who were GOOD vs the running game for years or something.

It boggles my mind that people think we never talk heck about Jerry, HCs and defenses. Even poor Rowdy gets his share. Season ticket holders "selling out" have gotten ragged on. How about poor Zeke?

"Carrot Top"
"Fat Mike".

THE FACT IS...everyone gets it and Dak is no exception.

So weird...like clinically.

 

[DarkVader33]

Are you serious? Dak had a contract ready to go back in 2020/1, but 3 games he was lighting up trash teams and then told Jerry, “Nah…we’re gonna wait this out.” So all the people who blame Jerry for not signing Dak sooner it was because:

1. Dak did not want to sign unless he was the highest paid (“for the brotherhood”)
2. Jerry did not believe Dak was worth it and said it to his face when he signed him
3. The MAIN sticking point was not money but YEARS: How many times can the pig return to the trough and stuff its fat guts? The more times a player can come back for more money - especially having no option to franchise tag - you can run up the bill. Dak and his agent are going to be back at the trough NEXT YEAR - having done NOTHING to earn his current contract …which is freaking hilarious.

OR you can do what WINNERS like Brady, Mahomes and Brunson did - give some of that money back in exchange for a trophy or ring.

Are YOU serious? You don’t think I would have preferred to have Dak take less money? Do you really think I was pleased with Dak being overpaid? I wanted Jerry to call Dak’s bluff and let him walk. I am referring to your comment that Dak did something shady. He didn’t do anything different that MOST other players. Bringing up the 1% that did doesn’t prove your argument, it’s the exception that proves mine.

How do you feel about Micah doing pretty much the EXACT same thing? I’m sure he gets a pass since you have a poster of him on your ceiling. Just kidding but you and many others really do have double standards for certain players/coaches

 

[GINeric]

It boggles my mind that people think we never talk heck about Jerry, HCs and defenses. Even poor Rowdy gets his share. Season ticket holders "selling out" have gotten ragged on. How about poor Zeke?

"Carrot Top"
"Fat Mike".

THE FACT IS...everyone gets it and Dak is no exception.

So weird...like clinically.

Yes Dak is no exception, nobody would disagree....

But I've mentioned nothing about Dak or specific positions. I spoke about head coache(S) as in plural. I spoke also about defense(S) as in plural.

I also mentioned (FOR OVER A DECADE). So you're telling me that Cowboys players that haven't played on those teams over a decade need to be mentioned? Thats weird. Everything Dallas Cowboys history isn't all Dak related. Dak is only a piece of Cowboys history, so there's no need to add him in posts speaking of things that happened before he was even in the NFL. That doesn't make sense. That's REALLY weird... like clinically.

Ive never seen people so obsessed with mentioning a player in topics that doesn't even include him.

For patches of last couple of decades, our offenses have been the reason the Cowboys have even had any glimpse of relevancy, thats why i didn't necessarily mention our offense(s), because without them for well over a decade, we would be the NY Jets of the NFCE.

 

[DallasInDC]

His overall record is 83-55-1. Meaning his record against non-division teams is 46-45-1.

46-45-1!!! Let that sink in.

Of course, don't forget his infamous 2-5 playoff record.

Come on man be real!

As you know that Dak is not solely responsible for the NFCE record, he is also not solely responsible for the non NFCE or playoff record. I know being a moderator doesn't make you higher IQ than anyone else, but i would expect you to be more genuine and less personal biased motivated.

Truth is, this team from owner on down has failed...with specific focus on the ones who have been around over the past 30 years.

I would have expected this type of comment from some of the more conflict driven posters, but a moderator should be less biased and more objective to promote reasonable type of interaction on the site (of course if you want to tell me your objective is to drive conflict between posters, I guess I get it...even if I don’t agree with it).

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Ive never seen people so obsessed with mentioning a player in topics that doesn't even include him.

We're in a Dak topic.

And don't play these rabbit hole games. We know what you're talking about. You and others mention every time there's a Dak thread. This one is no exception.

"team game"...EVERY....Single...time.

No...I do NOT have an objective to drive conflict between posters. You have "conflict" that's on you. The fact pof the matter is you are dead wrong. We talk about all the other issues all the time.

Talk about objective to drive conflict.

 

[ratkinson]

How can not making the playoffs get any worse?

Come again. I was responding to the last three lines of the OP.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Come again. I was responding to the last three lines of the OP.

Right. The last line was :
"Curious to how shotty does in playoff games, cant be much worse."

 

[Typhus]

I have bashed Dak in the past and everyone paying any attention has known how critical I have been on Dak, but I will say now that we are very fortunate to have him as our franchise QB.
His maturity will carry this offense to the next level, he has grown IMHO.

 

[GINeric]

Come on man be real!

As you know that Dak is not solely responsible for the NFCE record, he is also not solely responsible for the non NFCE or playoff record. I know being a moderator doesn't make you higher IQ than anyone else, but i would expect you to be more genuine and less personal biased motivated.

Truth is, this team from owner on down has failed...with specific focus on the ones who have been around over the past 30 years.

I would have expected this type of comment from some of the more conflict driven posters, but a moderator should be less biased and more objective to promote reasonable type of interaction on the site (of course if you want to tell me your objective is to drive conflict between posters, I guess I get it...even if I don’t agree with it).

It doesn't matter what position some people hold here. I don't know the requirements to become one of them but im guessing knowing how football works as a team sport isn't one of them.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Are YOU serious? You don’t think I would have preferred to have Dak take less money? Do you really think I was pleased with Dak being overpaid? I wanted Jerry to call Dak’s bluff and let him walk. I am referring to your comment that Dak did something shady. He didn’t do anything different that MOST other players. Bringing up the 1% that did doesn’t prove your argument, it’s the exception that proves mine.

How do you feel about Micah doing pretty much the EXACT same thing? I’m sure he gets a pass since you have a poster of him on your ceiling. Just kidding but you and many others really do have double standards for certain players/coaches

I'm not sure this is about what you wanted...only TheBSContinues publicly stated then and now that he was happy took advantage of his team.

Second, you never addressed any of the points regarding Dak's actions. Dak had agency...not just an agent. He DECIDED, MANEUVERED, SCHEMED AND DEFENDED being the highest paid as something he was honor-bound to do "for the brotherhood". Somehow, Brady and Mahomes felt no such obligation. Winners vs. Talkers.

 

[GINeric]

Come on man be real!

As you know that Dak is not solely responsible for the NFCE record, he is also not solely responsible for the non NFCE or playoff record. I know being a moderator doesn't make you higher IQ than anyone else, but i would expect you to be more genuine and less personal biased motivated.

Truth is, this team from owner on down has failed...with specific focus on the ones who have been around over the past 30 years.

I would have expected this type of comment from some of the more conflict driven posters, but a moderator should be less biased and more objective to promote reasonable type of interaction on the site (of course if you want to tell me your objective is to drive conflict between posters, I guess I get it...even if I don’t agree with it).

Are you really surprised? Im not!!

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Come on man be real!

As you know that Dak is not solely responsible for the NFCE record, he is also not solely responsible for the non NFCE or playoff record. I know being a moderator doesn't make you higher IQ than anyone else, but i would expect you to be more genuine and less personal biased motivated.

Truth is, this team from owner on down has failed...with specific focus on the ones who have been around over the past 30 years.

I would have expected this type of comment from some of the more conflict driven posters, but a moderator should be less biased and more objective to promote reasonable type of interaction on the site (of course if you want to tell me your objective is to drive conflict between posters, I guess I get it...even if I don’t agree with it).

So...because Dog commented on Dak's record...in a Dak thread....means Dog thinks he is the ONLY one responisbile for the record?


Good lord you guys assume a LOT. I think you need to think you know more football than anyone else. Becuase you know *dang* QB receive the glory AND the blame more than anone else...Dak is NO exceptio0n...and they get paid for it too.

So just stop this nonsense that people don't know it's a team game. You come off more idiotic than those yopu chastise.

 

[GINeric]

Second, you never addressed any of the points.

Well, well, well..... isn't that ironic. You're telling someone what THEY didn't address, yet you were the same scared lil boy who ran like a lil ***** from addressing my questions from the things that YOU said.

Well when are YOU going to address any of these "points" and stop running, ducking and hiding?

1. You never gave me the names of other quarterbacks and/or teams who were able to win a playoff game vs a number one ranked defense after committing 14 penalties....

2. You said that a quarterback is supposed to keep scoring until his defense figures it out.

I then asked for you to explain, ACCORDING TO YOUR NARRATIVES, how the GOAT and FIRST BALLOT HOF Tom Brady couldn't keep scoring and figure it out vs a team led by a quarterback named Eli Manning who's not even a HOFer, in not one, but TWO Superbowls?

Shouldn't a GOAT/HOF quarterback have been able to keep scoring more than a non HOF quarterback in two Superbowls?

You're narratives of a quarterback's responsibility isn't adding up according to what you've said. Care to "address" this?