Dak has been the QB for over 33% of our Super Bowl drought

That’s a relevant stat. This is his 11th season so that stat is slowly increasing and will be almost 35% soon. Defend Dak. Hate Dak. Truth is over 33% of our failures over the last three decades is tied to Dak.

Discuss.
Wait until you find out the 100% stat. It’s going to blow your mind. Until then I reckon you will continue running around blind folded
 
Dak, Dak, Dak, Dak Dak. Even after a win where Dak played a brilliant 2nd half and had a game winning drive to take the lead.

Dak isn't elite, but he is a good QB on a poorly managed team.
I try not to get into the elite or not elite talk but man that 2nd half was elite stuff especially against that personnel.
 
Time to stop blaming him and only him. No QB can win on their own yet somehow he is expected to…I guess because his contract was a big deal. Every decent QB makes nearly as much.

Without him, there’s no chance. Be happy to have him while we do, because the time it takes to find his replacement ain’t gonna be pretty.
 
Time to stop blaming him and only him. No QB can win on their own yet somehow he is expected to…I guess because his contract was a big deal. Every decent QB makes nearly as much.

Without him, there’s no chance. Be happy to have him while we do, because the time it takes to find his replacement ain’t gonna be pretty.
totally agree - he is more than good enough to get us there - imagine if we had a defense in the top 10....just imagine!
 
Dak, Dak, Dak, Dak Dak. Even after a win where Dak played a brilliant 2nd half and had a game winning drive to take the lead.

Dak isn't elite, but he is a good QB on a poorly managed team.
He played a garbage first half: 76 yards. You focus on the things that make you feel better about Dak...I focus on the guy who gets paid the most but hasn't delivered.

Perspectives differ.
 
But it ain't zero. Dakota's got chapped lips from the drought. No other Cowboy has been part of the drought for that long other than Romo...and he had like 9 years as a starter.
I mean it’s irrelevant unless the arguing made it’s not Jerry it’s Romo or Dak. But even then Jerry signed those guys so how is it on them lol? Also the guy who tried to extend Aikmans run by trading those picks for Galloway that very well could’ve been used for future after Aikman. So yeah I’m not sure if the intent is to just bash Dak or copium with Jerry but the issues predate even Romo and Dak.
 
He played a garbage first half: 76 yards. You focus on the things that make you feel better about Dak...I focus on the guy who gets paid the most but hasn't delivered.

Perspectives differ.
At the end of the day that’s a good defense that dominated and took advantage of our offense. Will Anderson against Steele can literally cost you a game and almost did. Started poor but Dak showed up once some things got handled offensively. You can tell they made adjustments at half the O looked completely different.
 
That’s a relevant stat. This is his 11th season so that stat is slowly increasing and will be almost 35% soon. Defend Dak. Hate Dak. Truth is over 33% of our failures over the last three decades is tied to Dak.

Discuss.
How long has Jerry Dumbo GM Jones been your owner, GM, and defacto Head Coach?

That is your problem.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
476,162
Messages
14,670,537
Members
24,227
Latest member
Nathaniel
Back
Top