DMN: NFL VP of Officiating: It’s not unreasonable to watch everything Dez did and think

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
NFL VP of Officiating: It’s not unreasonable to watch everything Dez did and think, 'That’s a catch'
http://www.***BANNED-URL***/incoming/20150718-football_injury_44645175.jpg.ece/BINARY/w940/FOOTBALL_INJURY_44645175.JPG

NFL VP of Officiating Dean Blandino recently joined the Ben and Skin show on KRLD-FM (105.3). Here are some highlights from the interview.

On how they didn’t change the catch rule in light of Dez Bryant’s no catch in Green Bay:

“A lot of people are involved in this, the competition committee, it’s not just me and officiating. I think the bottom line is the way the rule is being written out, the way it’s being applied allows us, the officials to be consistent as possible because if you try to create a rule to make the Bryant play — It’s not just the Dez play, there were others that were ruled incomplete over the past four or five years — if you tried to make a rule to make that a catch it would become more gray and we would become less consistent on the field, which is something that no one really wants. You may agree or disagree it’s a catch but we want to be consistent in applying the rule and this rule allows us to be more consistent.”

On incorporated common sense into the catch rule:

“Obviously we want to incorporate (common sense) into the rule. That’s why we had such a lengthy discussion because so many people looked at that and said, boy that’s got to be a catch. What we want coaches and want receivers to understand is hey look, if you’re falling to the ground, you have to survive the ground. If you reach you do put yourself at risk, so make sure you secure control first before you do anything with it.”

On whether he thought Dez caught the ball even if it doesn’t fit the rule:

“It’s not unreasonable to watch that play and watch everything Dez did and think, ‘That’s a catch.’ But our rule, which I do feel is a good rule and allows us to be consistent, it’s not a catch because you have to maintain control when you land.”

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW

http://www.***BANNED-URL***/sports/...verything-dez-did-and-think-thats-a-catch.ece

Bob Sturm: There's one part of the Dez Bryant deal that amazes me
  • Emmitt Smith: Murray to Eagles doesn't make them favorites over Cowboys: 'You cannot take us lightly'
  • Author John Feinstein: Dez Bryant acted selfishly by threatening to miss games
=======================================================================
:popcorn:
 
Last edited:

Tabascocat

Dexternjack
Messages
26,608
Reaction score
36,328
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
hammer_head.gif
beatdeadhorse5.gif
crying.gif


I'm over it finally....................I think!
 

AmericasTeam81

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,176
Reaction score
5,328
Was the ruling on the field a catch? Yes.
Was there indisputable evidence to overturn the ruling on the field? No.
Did Dez make a football move common to the game? Yes.

I believe the league screwed up on this one. With about 4 mins left and the ball at the one yard, 1st and goal, this would have been set up for a classic finish.
 

nathanlt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,003
Reaction score
2,970
There wasn't indisputable evidence that the ball hit the ground and popped up. It was a bad call. My jimmies are still rustled.

I do have the evidence that it popped up, but only AFTER both elbows made contact with the ground. Down by contact is the only ending to ANY process in the NFL rulebook. There is no other definition, and the comedian, yes he was an actual comedian, in the VP of officiating seat TAMPERED with a playoff game. Blandino absolutely tampered with the catch that Dez made. No amount of words will make that catch go away. The game is frozen in time, with the Cowboys 1st and goal at the 1.

I'm still livid about it. He tries to pretend there is consistency, when the rule DOES NOT DEFINE THE END OF ANY PROCESS. the process of a catch could conceivably go until a player retires with no definition of how to end the process. Down by contact is the only way to end a process.


Not to mention Dez made 7 football moves on that play.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,288
Reaction score
6,897
Down by contact with possession. It was a catch then. It's a catch now. And it will always be a catch.

Absolutely right!

Hey quick question - whatever happened to my favorite cheerleader of all time Abigail? I had heard she went to LA to try and make it but I don't know how that went. Are there any recent pics of her? Thanks!
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,390
Reaction score
17,213
I have wrestled with me feelings about this play all off season. And as much as I want that to be a catch, I see exactly what the refs see. Contact by Dez and the defender, no matter how many steps he took, is what caused him to fall IN THEIR EYES. It was not the reaching out, or leaping forward, but IN THEIR EYES, it was the sense of out of control and pushing off toward the goal line in a continuation of what they considered falling that counts.

IN THEIR EYES, HE WAS FALLING FORWARD.

One can make the argument he was stepping forward, but his body angle gave them a sense he was losing a fight with his balance. And that was precipitated by the contact.

In that light, he had to maintain control of the ball. The ball popped out of his hand. There is no disputing that.

Football move is far too subjective for anyone to assign that to what transpired.

I hate it, But I get it.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,437
Reaction score
48,250
I just hope and pray that wasn't our very best chance to get to the NFC Champ game and maybe the Super Bowl.

Time will tell. This year's team could very be significantly better and still not have as good a record or be in that last minutes, one yard line scenario.
It's not easy to even be in that position--especially in the current NFC.
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,557
Reaction score
4,446
I have wrestled with me feelings about this play all off season. And as much as I want that to be a catch, I see exactly what the refs see. Contact by Dez and the defender, no matter how many steps he took, is what caused him to fall IN THEIR EYES. It was not the reaching out, or leaping forward, but IN THEIR EYES, it was the sense of out of control and pushing off toward the goal line in a continuation of what they considered falling that counts.

IN THEIR EYES, HE WAS FALLING FORWARD.

One can make the argument he was stepping forward, but his body angle gave them a sense he was losing a fight with his balance. And that was precipitated by the contact.

In that light, he had to maintain control of the ball. The ball popped out of his hand. There is no disputing that.

Football move is far too subjective for anyone to assign that to what transpired.

I hate it, But I get it.

Trouble is he was not falling until after he landed on two feet and turned, he fell when he was tripped by the defender on the third step. And the ball did pop up, off of his arm, it never hit the ground.
 

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,398
Reaction score
6,338
I have wrestled with me feelings about this play all off season. And as much as I want that to be a catch, I see exactly what the refs see. Contact by Dez and the defender, no matter how many steps he took, is what caused him to fall IN THEIR EYES. It was not the reaching out, or leaping forward, but IN THEIR EYES, it was the sense of out of control and pushing off toward the goal line in a continuation of what they considered falling that counts.

IN THEIR EYES, HE WAS FALLING FORWARD.

One can make the argument he was stepping forward, but his body angle gave them a sense he was losing a fight with his balance. And that was precipitated by the contact.

In that light, he had to maintain control of the ball. The ball popped out of his hand. There is no disputing that.

Football move is far too subjective for anyone to assign that to what transpired.

I hate it, But I get it.

...which is exactly why you don't overturn the call on the field whether ruled complete or incomplete.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,231
Reaction score
17,331
I have wrestled with me feelings about this play all off season. And as much as I want that to be a catch, I see exactly what the refs see. Contact by Dez and the defender, no matter how many steps he took, is what caused him to fall IN THEIR EYES. It was not the reaching out, or leaping forward, but IN THEIR EYES, it was the sense of out of control and pushing off toward the goal line in a continuation of what they considered falling that counts.

IN THEIR EYES, HE WAS FALLING FORWARD.

One can make the argument he was stepping forward, but his body angle gave them a sense he was losing a fight with his balance. And that was precipitated by the contact.

In that light, he had to maintain control of the ball. The ball popped out of his hand. There is no disputing that.

Football move is far too subjective for anyone to assign that to what transpired.

I hate it, But I get it.

So lets say you're a rb out of the backfield. You catch a short dumpoff and are hit as you catch the ball and start to stumble forward. But since you are coming out of the backfield there is a lot of green grass in front of you and you stumble forward for another 10 yards and as you hit the ground the ball pops up but you jump back on it.

That's an incomplete pass to you? Because you were falling forward? And it doesn't matter how many steps you take?
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
Well it certainly is reassuring that the group who made a decision that 99% of people, regardless of team affiliation, disagree with doesn't think we are all being unreasonable. Mass insanity or a really bad decision in a heated and pressure-packed environment that supports said bad decision? That's a toughie.
 
Top