Twitter: More Trouble for Gregory (not confirmed)?

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,055
Reaction score
29,911
Could it simply be that Gregory has strict guidelines to follow with his "handler" and that when he went AWOL last week, that violated the agreement between him and the league?
I would tell the league to get lost. If they want to drug test him then do so when ever they want. If he has a baby sitter then it’s likely JJ doing. Like he did Dez.
 

Qbert

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
2,774
Sorry, tweets are blocked at work and I don't have my cell phone today. Can you summarize?
Here’s what the tweets say from Jeff skin Wade

So the rumor that we’ll hear something about a certain Cowboy defensive player “in a couple of days” is hurting my feelings...they’re just rumors, right? RIGHT??????

I mean, why would you hear “news” on a player “in a couple of days” if it wasn’t “bad news” ???? sorry about all the “””””””””””
 

John813

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,360
Reaction score
34,276
Hoping it's about Irving, and not Gregory.

Rather see Irving gone for another X amount of games then lose RG indefinitely.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,205
Reaction score
92,106
I would tell the league to get lost. If they want to drug test him then do so when ever they want. If he has a baby sitter then it’s likely JJ doing. Like he did Dez.

If it's in the agreement with Gregory for reinstatement, unfortunately, he's bound by that.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,055
Reaction score
29,911
If it's in the agreement with Gregory for reinstatement, unfortunately, he's bound by that.
What a invasion of privacy. If he does drugs and fails then he is out. But if he wants to hang out unsupervised for a while then leave him alone.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,205
Reaction score
92,106
What a invasion of privacy. If he does drugs and fails then he is out. But if he wants to hang out unsupervised for a while then leave him alone.

It's not an invasion if Gregory agreed to it. In other words, if Gregory is supposed to spend X hours a day with this guy, and/or check in at these times with the guy and he doesn't............. Gregory has no one to blame but himself and he can't fall back on things like he needs his own time or invasion of privacy.

You are bound by what you agreed to.
 

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,857
Reaction score
60,972
It's not an invasion if Gregory agreed to it. In other words, if Gregory is supposed to spend X hours a day with this guy, and/or check in at these times with the guy and he doesn't............. Gregory has no one to blame but himself and he can't fall back on things like he needs his own time or invasion of privacy.

You are bound by what you agreed to.

It’s still an invasion. It’s not exactly an agreement one enters into freely. It’s an agreement he had to make with a gun to the head of his career.

A gun he helped place to the head of his career. But a gun nonetheless.
 

GroundZero1970

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,592
Reaction score
1,875
Truth is all these mediots are piggybacking off of Laconfora's vague tweet. If any of them knew anything they woulda said it already
 

ClappingCarrot

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,769
Reaction score
19,465
Based on Jerry's comments (especially the last two seasons), I don't know what to believe at this point. But history has shown that Jerry is not a trustworthy source, and he's the face of the organization.

I want to believe this is a matter related to his comments about the mental health policy, because Randy even declined comment Sunday night about his sack in the 1st quarter. I almost feel like the Cowboys staff told him to shut up because that star on his helmet is also a target.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,055
Reaction score
29,911
It's not an invasion if Gregory agreed to it. In other words, if Gregory is supposed to spend X hours a day with this guy, and/or check in at these times with the guy and he doesn't............. Gregory has no one to blame but himself and he can't fall back on things like he needs his own time or invasion of privacy.

You are bound by what you agreed to.
Understand, but why would the NFL want him to do that? “We wanna keep a eye on you”. I would think since he is A Cowboy that goodell would want him to fail. Lol. I could see JJ putting baby sitter with him.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,920
Reaction score
58,594
They need to tell Dallas something quickly. Cuts are due in three days.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,031
Reaction score
17,942
You assume the Cowboys are telling you the truth.

My guess is that even if they knew something, they wouldn't even give a hint that they know anything.

Until the appeals process is completed, they would be in violation of the CBA if they said anything on the record.
 

cristglo

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,538
Reaction score
1,371
Until the appeals process is completed, they would be in violation of the CBA if they said anything on the record.
Just asking but how can he appeal anything until he is charged with doing something?? Just like all the other players like Eldeman was suspended then he could make an appeal against the failed test
 

Avery

The Dog that Saved Charleston
Messages
19,465
Reaction score
20,518
First rule of journalism: throw out something unsubstantiated to get followers/create a dialogue
Second rule: hope it somehow becomes true to generate even more followers/rep as an inside source
Third rule: if second rule doesn't come to fruition, never acknowledge it again and move back to first rule
 
Top