Sad thing is, it was Clarence Hill getting desperate for clicks.
Is there a worse set of journalists than those that cover this team???Sad thing is, it was Clarence Hill getting desperate for clicks.
Seems to be on par or better with what’s around the league. Journalism these days is much different then it was 20 years ago.Is there a worse set of journalists than those that cover this team???
I think quite of lot of them are little puppets for the organization.Is there a worse set of journalists than those that cover this team???
Dallas writers are a different breed. They function alongside of an organization that is its own hype machine.Seems to be on par or better with what’s around the league. Journalism these days is much different then it was 20 years ago.
Very true. But you see the other side of the coin like NY? Even worse.Dallas writers are a different breed. They function alongside of an organization that is its own hype machine.
No other team markets its brand so strongly.
I would rather have an adversarial press than a complicit one.Very true. But you see the other side of the coin like NY? Even worse.
And 99% of them are afraid to ask Jerry any type of challenging question.Dallas writers are a different breed. They function alongside of an organization that is its own hype machine.
No other team markets its brand so strongly.
What "fresh ideas" guy is not only going to get Jones' attention but also feel comfortable with him?He’s not coming and I don’t want him anyways. Don’t get me wrong, he would be an upgrade to Garrett, but I want new blood coming in with fresh ideas and who came up with this new breed of football.
Is there a worse set of journalists than those that cover this team???
LakersIs there a worse set of journalists than those that cover this team???