My Insane Mock draft

ultron

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,925
Reaction score
8,992
Not saying I'd do it , but that's the price of draft capital....
No it isn't, show me one time a team has traded their starting QB that's 4 years into his career and has been to a pro-bowl + two 1st round draft picks for a guy that isn't proven at all.

If they traded us Burrow and two 1st round picks for Dak - I would do that but not the other way around.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,265
Reaction score
26,170
Just bc you don't think Cincinnati would pay him or that dak would take the Bengals money, also doesn't mean it's true..
I'm just saying theres no trading a guy on an unsigned tag.

He doesnt suddenly go on the Bengals tag nor does either team have the right to do that to the player.

When anyone has ever been traded on the tag they have either signed it already or the contract has been agreed to between the player and new team as part of the trade.

No one is ever trading for a disgruntled player unless they previously agree to no longer be.
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,508
Reaction score
22,114
I'm just saying theres no trading a guy on an unsigned tag.

He doesnt suddenly go on the Bengals tag nor does either team have the right to do that to the player.

When anyone has ever been traded on the tag they have either signed it already or the contract has been agreed to between the player and new team as part of the trade.

No one is ever trading for a disgruntled player unless they previously agree to no longer be.

Nobody here is suggesting this

If a team is going to trade for dak, they're going to have to pay him..everybody already understands that

There is zero use in bringing that up..it's a given
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,265
Reaction score
26,170
Nobody here is suggesting this

If a team is going to trade for dak, they're going to have to pay him..everybody already understands that

There is zero use in bringing that up..it's a given
It was directed at the OP. My fault
 
Top