Moore called a heck of a game today!

kevm3 · Sep 20, 2020

One thing I liked was the adjustments and the fact that he STUCK WITH IT. We started with that ultra predictable, conservative offense, and opened it up and then stuck with it.

8FOR!3 · Sep 20, 2020

It started rough but I do agree his playcalling wasn't bad.

bodi · Sep 20, 2020

I like him

Proof · Sep 20, 2020

rocyaice said:
I can't say that. His play calling was a big reason for the 20-0 score but he was better than last week.

Unless he specifically called for fumbles i disagree

JBond · Sep 20, 2020

GimmeTheBall! said:
And then there are the seahawks.
defence has to step up!
Props to da Boys, gangstahs of the offence!!!

We will need 49 points to win.

GimmeTheBall! · Sep 20, 2020

JBond said:
We will need 49 points to win.

Damn.

JBond · Sep 21, 2020

GimmeTheBall! said:
Damn.

Close

Colombiacowboy · Sep 21, 2020

rocyaice said:
I can't say that. His play calling was a big reason for the 20-0 score but he was better than last week.

Was it the play calling or the 5 fumbles (although Pollard was officially down and one we recovered) and the failed fake punt?

Colombiacowboy · Sep 21, 2020

PJTHEDOORS said:
Moore refused to give Pollard any RB touches. Big fail.

Pollard carried on the first and second play of the game...and he put it on the turf (although he was technically down).

Jarv · Sep 21, 2020

PJTHEDOORS said:
Moore refused to give Pollard any RB touches. Big fail.

Moore scored 40 points even after the "Star" offensive players fumbled 4 times and turned the ball over 3 times. If that is a "Big Fail" to you, well then you'll have to open your eyes and break on through to the other side.

BrassCowboy · Sep 21, 2020

Well I might back up and say we were down by 20 because of lackluster play calling. I was telling at my tv at why he wasn't calling a faster offense seeing our oline is being beat like a pinata

He regrouped just in time and the game plan was much better called from there. That is the pace we need to keep it from now on, especially against the Seahawks who we will need to score 70 points if we expect to win which I don't so....

JW82 · Sep 21, 2020

I see teams like KC and LA and even ATL yesterday who design plays to have a wide open receiver. I don’t see that with Moores offense. I see guys having to beat their man every play in order for the play to work. When they are beating their guy things are great, but I’d like to see a receiver running free a few times per game because of the play design. Hard to sustain relying on your guys to win every snap.

Londonboy · Sep 21, 2020

BrassCowboy said:
Well I might back up and say we were down by 20 because of lackluster play calling. I was telling at my tv at why he wasn't calling a faster offense seeing our oline is being beat like a pinata

He regrouped just in time and the game plan was much better called from there. That is the pace we need to keep it from now on, especially against the Seahawks who we will need to score 70 points if we expect to win which I don't so....

We were down by 20 because We kept coughing up the ball.

SteveTheCowboy · Sep 21, 2020

CowboyRoy said:
This was impressive. As disappointed as I was with last weeks play calling, this was the other side of the spectrum.

They switched to the quick passing attack to compensate for the Oline and I loved how it worked.

The Moore that showed up at time last year showed up again.

I even like what he was doing before halftime.

Very nice to see such enthusiasm and positive credit!

SteveTheCowboy · Sep 21, 2020

JW82 said:
I see teams like KC and LA and even ATL yesterday who design plays to have a wide open receiver. I don’t see that with Moores offense. I see guys having to beat their man every play in order for the play to work. When they are beating their guy things are great, but I’d like to see a receiver running free a few times per game because of the play design. Hard to sustain relying on your guys to win every snap.

Any suggestions? I have two:

1) Let's run some pick plays. Or get better at it. I wonder if week 1 CeeDee's 4th down was SUPPOSED to be a rub?

2) Let's throw tighter and sooner. It's like DB's don't have to fear anything. SO they just sit on WR.

phildadon86 · Sep 21, 2020

PJTHEDOORS said:
Moore refused to give Pollard any RB touches. Big fail.

No he did. Then Pollard almost lost the ball.

PJTHEDOORS · Sep 21, 2020

phildadon86 said:
No he did. Then Pollard almost lost the ball.

Pollard 3 touches total. Moore failed.

Redline360 · Sep 21, 2020

As expected by most. What happens when you let the offense ball out on motion, misdirections and etc. The only thing I still would like to see changed is the running on first downs still. Don't think we did much of that late game

Now we need to hope he doesn't resent back to the boring / predictable offense

Captain43Crash · Sep 21, 2020

Wezsh0T said:
In both games now, when we go hurry up with no-huddle, we seem to be moving the ball with ease. That seems to be the new identity of this offense.

Dak has always been good in the no huddle. Garrett and Linehan would seldom run it until we were losing at the end of the game. It was one of the many things I disliked about Garrett.

starfan1 · Sep 21, 2020

rocyaice said:
I can't say that. His play calling was a big reason for the 20-0 score but he was better than last week.

I'm have to disagree the play calling didn't contribute to the deficit lack of execution did. Play calling had 0 to with the fumbles. opportunistic Atlanta play and stupidity on Dak was the reason. IMO

Moore called a heck of a game today!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Junior College Transfer

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Loud pipes saves lives.

Well-Known Member

JJ21

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member