T-RO
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,824
- Reaction score
- 16,341
wrong Thats just hindsite
I was saying it out-loud the moment the punt team came on, before Dallas's drive. And I say it based on the data, not emotion or a particular game outcome.
wrong Thats just hindsite
Have you forgotten how many times we've already converted 4th down in "risky" situations this year?
No risk it, no biscuit. Bill goes to bed hungry.
He looked like a rookie for most of the game past the first quarter.Has completed about 70% of his passes this year. Analysts have praised his accuracy, quickness to get ball out, and decision-making.
Just needed a short pass to a RB or tight end.
Interesting. If you assume it’s the fourth quarter, the difference is fairly small to go for it. Over a million simulations, you have a slightly better chance to win. In one case it’s relatively insignificant.Check out this calculator on whether to go for it or not. You can enter in the most meaningful game situation and run the calculation.
https://rbsdm.com/stats/fourth_calculator/
If you say so...You have time enough to repeatedly dispute and diminish people posting here.
Not 5 minutes to look at some articles that explain analytics. So lame.
Message board romantics? You are the one clinging to a fuzzy, warm, lost era of football, where you run on first and second down, and always dutifully punt on 4th down.
I've lost track of the Boston-area and national analysts criticizing Bill for his cowardly ways. And not only on that play but in other decisions Sunday and over the past couple years.
Just "message board romantics" slamming Bill for conservative ways? Here's others:
-Writers @ The Athletic
-Basically all local Bostonian media
-PFF
-ESPN
-Fox Sports
-NFL.com
Etc.
Their criticism doesn't prove the case here, but perhaps you should take a read or a listen.
Has completed about 70% of his passes this year. Analysts have praised his accuracy, quickness to get ball out, and decision-making.
Just needed a short pass to a RB or tight end.
He looked like a rookie for most of the game past the first quarter.
I
Honestly glanced at it, just don't buy into analytics.
And he had been picked once, hit five times, and sacked twice in 21 attempts. Their run game was not consistent after we adjusted to their traps in the second quarter.
Now that is a logical response, and one I can agree with you on.We all are free agents in this world, can choose our own interests. Right?
But if you know a big fat zero about analytics, and have zero interest in learning...you have disqualified yourself to come in with any critique, don't you think?
I know nothing about cars and auto mechanics. Am I going to insert my ignorance into a debate that is way over my head, all while pretending I know better than people who actually invest time, have experience and study?