percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
Although the team made the right move in hindsight, this is why Romo stood on the table to try to keep Laurent Robinson.
-
Read the latest Dallas Cowboys News!Dallas Cowboys Newswire
How did Dallas lose that game?
- Thread starter DasTex
- Start date
DandyDon52
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,423
- Reaction score
- 15,465
some say he is a genius !
Dave_in-NC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,049
- Reaction score
- 5,132
Third and forever and we couldn't keep the play in front of our defense. Blitz don't work and your burned any way. Like I said, a great play by the Packers.ok so 3 man rush and no one covering cook had no bearing on the play ???
lukin2006
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,965
- Reaction score
- 19,287
In my opinion coaching ... This coaching staff has not proven they are capable of leading this team in crunch time. Some things I really felt they could not do against GB was fall behind big and get off to a slow start and turnovers, the turnovers were a balanced out...the other 2 was on full display. JG and this coaching will not lead this team to promised land, we can wait, but it's pretty evident for the most part this coaching staff struggles in December and January under this regime.
bayeslife
187beatdown
- Messages
- 9,457
- Reaction score
- 8,573
Yeah, that's what I essentially meant. There was roughly 30 seconds left and they needed a TD
Jake
Beyond tired of Jerry
- Messages
- 36,067
- Reaction score
- 84,350
The difference was Dallas only needed a FG to win at Pittsburgh, so letting the clock run was fine. It just so happened they crowded the line and Zeke popped one. In the GB game a FG only tied it. Dallas was trying to get a TD - does anyone think they really wanted to play overtime with Rodgers?
In the end, we only got a FG and Rodgers had time to pull a rabbit out of his hat. We tried to win instead of settling for OT, and it cost us. I'm okay with that philosophy.