Instead of a power ranking, I am grouping NFC teams into one of these two groups. What's this true contender you speak of? Glad you asked.
It isn't about the record as much as having seen them play. A true contender looks like one of the playoff teams right now. Operative words there are "right now" because as these teams play each other, this is going to be fluid. For instance, SF was a contender because of the record until I saw them play last night and they look for real to me, true contender. For a contender to step up, they need to beat a true contender or several of their co contenders but the true contender is based on the playoff system of only 6 teams.
My true contenders are: SF, SEA, LAR, NO, GB and PHL.
My contenders are: CAR, CHI, DET, MIN and DAL.
BTW, I relayed the wrong information about tie breakers in a previous post. The division record only comes into play in the case where 3 or more teams tie. If 2 tie, it's head to head and then the conference record and then common games.
The upcoming games against PHL are obviously critical but almost as critical are the games against those fellow contenders in the North. Right now, the Cowboys need for GB and NO to win their divisions to take them out of the tiebreaker scenario and if the Cowboys should tie with PHL and they split, all of these NFC games come into play.
This week's contenders' face off: PHL v MIN, SF v LAR and DET v GB. If you are wondering which team we should root for, we need PHL to get more losses, LAR to win since we play them and GB because we need for them to win their division.
Too early to talk playoffs? No, I don't think so because this takes us out of the ongoing dragging the last loss over the concrete until it's bled out and focuses our attention back on the season. There are a lot of big games yet to be played to set the playoff stage.