The Cowboys should sign Keenum, and let Dak decide what to do next

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
56,996
Reaction score
35,091
Come on now. You put Dak on that Commanders team and they would still be in about the same area. That is not about the QB. That's about the trainwreck that is the Washington Commanders.

Sure, they still probably would have been bad but Dak wouldn’t of ended up getting benched. They would have gotten better play from him than what they have at the position. Keenum wouldn’t have gotten benched if the Commanders didn’t think he was part of the problem. They wouldn’t have used a first round pick on Haskins if they thought Keenum was the answer.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
26,192
Prescott is a better QB that CK or even as good, it's not even debatable. I would be happy to have him as a back up though.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,375
Reaction score
102,315
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Sure, they still probably would have been bad but Dak wouldn’t of ended up getting benched. They would have gotten better play from him than what they have at the position.

But the Commanders would still have been terrible, glad we can agree on that.

Keenum wouldn’t have gotten benched if the Commanders didn’t think he was part of the problem.

Sure he would, when the head coach gets fired and you have a rookie QB waiting in the wings, and your season is shot anyway. You see what the kid has and get him some experience.

They wouldn’t have used a first round pick on Haskins if they thought Keenum was the answer.

Who ever claimed that Keenum is "the answer"?
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,530
Reaction score
17,889
Keenum is less roster dependent than Dak.

You trolls keep running from the game, don’t you want to play? You count the All-Pros that Keenum has played with, and I’ll count Dak’s. Whoever has less has to leave the board forever. What do you say?
Keep running, troll...
LOL...you are way too funny....ok…so Keenum who had a losing record all his career....got a #1 overall defense, top 10 rushing attack for his only good season...only winning season..... and he was average during that season . he wasn't even top 10...AWSOME. yet Dak who had less support this year compared to Keenum's best year, ended up #2 passer in the league...hmmmm in 2016, dallas had #14 defense and went 13-3...hmmmm

you need to leave this board forever, you are obviously a troll who is not interested in any facts....give me your address and I will send you a copy of Football for Dummies...What do you say?
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,654
Reaction score
9,826
The Cowboys should get Case Keenum and give him a four year deal.
He would be an upgrade immediately, and at worst would solidify the Cowboys at quarterback if they do eventually sign Dak.
Phillip Rivers is also available, and is an upgrade.
Ryan Tannehill is available.
The Cowboys don't have to be in this soap opera with a guy who went 8-8 but wants to be paid like he is a proven winner.
Signing a veteran like Keenum- who has been a winner- would likely change Dak's attitude towards a new contract.
But I believe that the Cowboys would make it to the NFC Championship game next year with a guy like Keenum under center.
Tannehill will not be available. The titans are going to lock him up or tag him, one or the other.
Rivers???? Cmon, dude is like 38 and not going anywhere. He will stay with Chargers or possibly retire. He has like 17 children and I dont think he wants to up his family and move.
Keenum? Hes decent, and decent tpo have if you are in between and looking for your guy.... but I personally wouldnt want him.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,931
Reaction score
5,023
I'm gonna tell you something here. This board was not always this way. Yes, people would use the term "troll" on occasion and there would be arguments but now, you see that term get used in almost every single thread. It's like this board has suddenly become populated with a bunch of posters who are way more interested in attacking other people, rather then moving beyond that and actually discussing issues. I have been guilty of this very same thing in recent weeks and I've decided that it's stupid. I'm dragging myself down by allowing it. I'm not going to do it anymore because I know this board was better then this before and I know that I was better then that before and I know I can be again. I'm getting back to having productive discussion. I'm not wasting my time on baiting posts etc.

Just gonna try and do what I do, only better.
There was an influx of posters who came from another board that shut down, and there they immediately called anyone who didn't go along with their point of view a Troll.
That's why it's becoming an issue here. When I first came here 12 years ago some of them followed me and began causing trouble then. I knew the folks on this board were generally more mature, so I left in order to keep them from ruining this place.
I am sorry you are having to deal with it.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
And you once again ignorantly think you're the guy that decides what's "important". Derp. Derp.



Then don't!

Nobody said a word about Winston other than you, but you go ahead and bring him up again and again and talk about what anyone's "logic" is. You speak for no one else. Deal with it.

Be the guy I've called you out to be, the brat who can't handle when someone else refutes his opinion with stats.

Make everything I've said true and continue to pitch your fit Veruca.

InsignificantCapitalGroundhog-size_restricted.gif
Are you really this dense? I’m following your “logic”. Winston led the NFL in passing yards and was 2nd in passing TDs. Therefore he is a top 5 QB by following your “logic”. You are just trolling now if you really need that explained to you.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,931
Reaction score
5,023
But the Commanders would still have been terrible, glad we can agree on that.



Sure he would, when the head coach gets fired and you have a rookie QB waiting in the wings, and your season is shot anyway. You see what the kid has and get him some experience.



Who ever claimed that Keenum is "the answer"?
The Commanders signed Keenum because Alex Smith was injured.
Haskins had nothing to do with Keenum, or vice versa.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
56,996
Reaction score
35,091
But the Commanders would still have been terrible, glad we can agree on that.



Sure he would, when the head coach gets fired and you have a rookie QB waiting in the wings, and your season is shot anyway. You see what the kid has and get him some experience.



Who ever claimed that Keenum is "the answer"?

Like I mentioned they were 1-7 with Keenum. Don’t kid yourself there’s fans on this board that think Keenum would be an upgrade over Dak.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,375
Reaction score
102,315
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Are you really this dense? I’m following your “logic”. Winston led the NFL in passing yards and was 2nd in passing TDs. Therefore he is a top 5 QB by following your “logic”. You are just trolling now if you really need that explained to you.

The only person who's trying to have passing yards be the end-all, be-all statistic here is you.

You deal with that fact.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,530
Reaction score
17,889
The only thing you presented was stupidity.

. It’s time for you to go to bed now, the conversation has gotten a little complicated for you.
By your logic Jameis was the number one QB in the league this year because of yards....he only had 112 more yards than Dak, and if that's a measuring stick, then I guess Jamies is better than brees, brady, Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, Russell Wilson....is that what you are saying?

Jamies had the most yards, but threw 30 Int.... the highest number in the league among starting QBs....in fact he was horrible..the next was Baker Mayfield who threw 21...…......his QB rating was 35th in the league among QBs with significant playing time ...he only threw 3 more TDs than dak, but had 19 more Ints…..hmmm

so is Jamies still a better QB than Dak? is he better than Brees? is he better than brady? is he better than Wilson? is he better than Mahomes? I mean he threw for so much more yards....

or if you want to be very specific in your categorization....you can say that Jamies Winston is better than Dak in games that started at 4:00 PM, when the temperature was above 68 degrees, in games played on Sunday, when he was east of Mississippi….I mean when you are picking and choosing why not go all the way
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
The only person who's trying to have passing yards be the end-all, be-all statistic here is you.

You deal with that fact.
You're a troll who can barely add two numbers and can't even remember what they posted five minutes ago
You deal with that fact.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,375
Reaction score
102,315
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Jamies had the most yards, but threw 30 Int.... the highest number in the league among starting QBs....in fact he was horrible..the next was Baker Mayfield who threw 21...…......his QB rating was 35th in the league among QBs with significant playing time ...he only threw 3 more TDs than dak, but had 19 more INts…..hmmm

so is Jamies still a better QB than Dak?

or if you want to be very specific you can say that Jamies Winston is better than Dak in games that started at 4:00 PM, when the temperature was about 68 degrees, in games played on sunday, when he was east of mississipi….I mean when you are picking and choosing why not go all the way

Veruca just doesn't like it when any stats are presented that conflict with her opinions. She then has to resort to ridiculous strawman arguments.
 
Top