JohnsKey19
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,502
- Reaction score
- 18,376
Analytics are fine. But wow, this stat is exactly why you have to be really careful when applying them to make judgements on players/teams...
Analytics are fine. But wow, this stat is exactly why you have to be really careful when applying them to make judgements on players/teams...
Analytics are fine. But wow, this stat is exactly why you have to be really careful when applying them to make judgements on players/teams...
Analytics are fine. But wow, this stat is exactly why you have to be really careful when applying them to make judgements on players/teams...
Ummm pff grades are not analytics.
Ummm pff grades are not analytics.
It will probably be the last thing from interesting lol. A pissed off Cheifs team that’s under .500 for the first time in the Mahomes era, they are gonna come out angry and pile it on.Well, at least the Eagle fans have something to hang their hat on this morning. I am sure the hardcore Eagle fans will point to this stat as a positive.
Eagles Chiefs should be interesting next week.
Does PFF count as analytics? Aren’t the grades subjective?
It will probably be the last thing from interesting lol. A pissed off Cheifs team that’s under .500 for the first time in the Mahomes era, they are gonna come out angry and pile it on.
Citing PFF as analytics is incorrect, they allow subjectivity into it and the basis of analytics is all subjectivity is removed.
As long as we get a W, that's what is important. With the exception of the play in the endzone, (he needed to get rid of the ball quicker), Dak did great. Who would have thunk a 40 burger was on the menu? At that point in the game, not me.
Daks made a living of themGarbage stats count....