YosemiteSam
Unfriendly and Aloof!
- Messages
- 45,858
- Reaction score
- 22,194
DallasCowboysRule!;3490145 said:How long is a CPU year?
nyc;3490894 said:1 year. For instance if they had 365 CPUs running simultaneously for 1 full day, the total CPU time used would equate to one year of (CPU) time.
NASA's new "Discover" super computer has a total of about 15,000 processors. If you were to run Discover at maximum capacity (using all CPUs) for one full day, it would be as if you computed whatever it is you were doing on one CPU for over 41 straight years!
15,000CPUs running for 1 day / 365 days in a year = 41.0958 years of CPU time.
joseephuss;3490912 said:Is processor speed taken into account? Processor A may be a lot faster than processor B.
nyc;3490961 said:Nope. Thats where they use FLOPS. (FLoating point Operations Per Second)
yottaFLOPS 10 to the 24
zettaFLOPS 10 to the 21
exaFLOPS 10 to the 18
petaFLOPS 10 to the 15
teraFLOPS 10 to the 12
gigaFLOPS 10 to the 9
megaFLOPS 10 to the 6
kiloFLOPS 10 to the 3
The Discover supercomputer listed above is capable of (aggregate) 159 teraFLOPS. It can basically, calculate 159 trillion floating point operations per second. Discover is a Climate Simulation supercomputer.
Just to be clear, the Discover supercomputer wasn't used in the Rubix Cube calculations. I was just using it as an example.
ABQCOWBOY;3491058 said:RPERF or Relative Performance is probably a more accurate measure. Floating Points are relative to a program and some Computers are designed to handle Floating Point Workloads better then others. I mean, what do you need? Do you need I/O or do you need Cache?
Either way, the guy that said, "useful 30 years ago" was probably right.