Aviation

This type of failure can be caused by maneuvering the helicopter aggressively, which causes the main rotor to hit the tail boom and separate it. It’s pretty rare, but it happens.
no indication of any need by the pilot to do so. No aircraft nearby; not close to anything. Doubtful its pilot error. Now maybe he suffered a heart attack; stroke; etc. But other than that, looks more like failure of the aircraft more than pilot error.
 
no indication of any need by the pilot to do so. No aircraft nearby; not close to anything. Doubtful its pilot error. Now maybe he suffered a heart attack; stroke; etc. But other than that, looks more like failure of the aircraft more than pilot error.
Yeah, I agree, but I was just pointing out that other things are possible. The NTSB is very good at their job and will find out what happened.
 
Yeah, I agree, but I was just pointing out that other things are possible. The NTSB is very good at their job and will find out what happened.
I hope something can come from this. Something that will make a difference. But sadly, most accidents only leave behind grief and loss.

While the vast majority of accidents have something to do with pilot error, I just have a hunch this is not one of them.
 
The pilot was a Navy Seal. I'll need some proof that the pilot was messing up.
To be fair, SEALs don’t train to fly helicopters. He had to have done it on his own time which begs the question…..how much experience did he have? With that said, I don’t think it was pilot error either.
 
Awesome stuff. How in the hell did I miss this thread.

I had 16 years in helping design aircraft engines. 6 years in aircraft wheels and brakes and landing gear. And 12 in airframe and other areas, hydraulic and fuel system design of aircraft and helicopters. Mostly military aircraft.
So if my math is still up to par that would be 34 years! Sounds like u had an exciting career, good for u! Boeing?
 
Awesome stuff. How in the hell did I miss this thread.

I had 16 years in helping design aircraft engines. 6 years in aircraft wheels and brakes and landing gear. And 12 in airframe and other areas, hydraulic and fuel system design of aircraft and helicopters. Mostly military aircraft.
Very cool!
 
So if my math is still up to par that would be 34 years! Sounds like u had an exciting career, good for u! Boeing?
Pratt Whitney, GE, Roll Royce Aircraft Engines.
Bell Helicopter, a little with Boeing and Lockheed.
BF Goodrich Aerospace.

A few other smaller aircraft companies.
About half the time it was on contract engineering with the airframe.
 
Pratt Whitney, GE, Roll Royce Aircraft Engines.
Bell Helicopter, a little with Boeing and Lockheed.
BF Goodrich Aerospace.

A few other smaller aircraft companies.
About half the time it was on contract engineering with the airframe.
what is your opinion on Boeing? Do you think they will get back on track?
 
what is your opinion on Boeing? Do you think they will get back on track?
All major AC companies do eventually.
Too big of a company, and too important for the workforce for both government and commercial contracts.

Boeing is St. Louis may be going on a big hiring spree soon. Gearing up for the F-47 NGAD fighter aircraft.
It is supposed to replace and be more powerful than the F-22 Raptor.
NGAD is Next Generation Aircraft Dominance.
 
All major AC companies do eventually.
Too big of a company, and too important for the workforce for both government and commercial contracts.

Boeing is St. Lotus may be going on a big hiring spree soon. Gearing up for the F-47 NGAD fighter aircraft.
It is supposed to replace and be more powerful than the F-22 Raptor.
NGAD is Next Generation Aircraft Dominance.
too big to fail is a claim I have heard before and it is all too many times not a good thing.
 
too big to fail is a claim I have heard before and it is all too many times not a good thing.
Besides Boeing and Airbus, who else still makes those long range passenger planes? Is McDonnell Douglas still around?
 
Besides Boeing and Airbus, who else still makes those long range passenger planes? Is McDonnell Douglas still around?
They merged with Boeing a long time ago. Lots of Boeing’s issues come from adopting McDonnell Douglas’ ethos. It’s essentially a duopoly. There’s Embraer, but they only make regional jets.
 
They merged with Boeing a long time ago. Lots of Boeing’s issues come from adopting McDonnell Douglas’ ethos. It’s essentially a duopoly. There’s Embraer, but they only make regional jets.
lots of boeing's issues are self inflicted by bad management
 
Back
Top