Barring any trades 3 positions are a must!

[Cowboyny]

WR-after the top 4, big drop-off.

RB-although a depth class, cannot wait to the 5th rd and hope a quality back is still available.

CB-who knows when Diggs returns, big hole in the slot. Good depth, but they need a corner who can play snaps year 1.

Would like to add a NT, LB, maybe edge, but with just 3 top 100 picks will be hard to address

 

[big dog cowboy]

WR-after the top 4, big drop-off.

Campbell
Flournoy
Lamb
Mingo
Tolbert
Turpin


Which 4?

 

[Cowboyny]

Campbell
Flournoy
Lamb
Mingo
Tolbert
Turpin


Which 4?

Top 4 prospects in the draft

 

[Mr_437]

Campbell
Flournoy
Lamb
Mingo
Tolbert
Turpin


Which 4?

Lamb
Tolbert
Mingo/Flournoy
Turp

Campbell
Brooks

 

[Chasing6]

WR-after the top 4, big drop-off.

RB-although a depth class, cannot wait to the 5th rd and hope a quality back is still available.

CB-who knows when Diggs returns, big hole in the slot. Good depth, but they need a corner who can play snaps year 1.

Would like to add a NT, LB, maybe edge, but with just 3 top 100 picks will be hard to address

I am not sure that our FO see's it that way.

1. We traded for a WR, supposedly for the future.
2. We picked up 2 RB's in FA. Are they going to completely abandon their RB by committee theory from last year?
3. We traded for a CB and they expect Carson to step up.

With all the holes we have, there is a legit argument for OL, DT and DE.

We keep talking about being more physical and running the ball. How does drafting a WR, RB and CB aline with that?

You can never count out a TE with GM Jethro.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

I am not sure that our FO see's it that way.

1. We traded for a WR, supposedly for the future.
2. We picked up 2 RB's in FA. Are they going to completely abandon their RB by committee theory from last year?
3. We traded for a CB and they expect Carson to step up.

With all the holes we have, there is a legit argument for OL, DT and DE.

We keep talking about being more physical and running the ball. How does drafting a WR, RB and CB aline with that?

You can never count out a TE with GM Jethro.

Not sure how you can see holes DT/DE and not see them at WR or RB. 2 FA RBs signed were depth at best for a room with only Deuce as a returning vet. I agree we are probably not using a first, but I'm sure day-2 is possible.
Drafting a CB high is more about the future. We could be without both current CBs this time next season. Bland is an FA we may let walk ( too expensive ), and 2025 is the final year of any guaranteed money on Diggs's contract.

I definitely can see OLine as a strong possibility if Campbell or Membou falls to 12.

 

[805BoysInBlue]

We need DTs. This has been an issue for decades. This draft has a bunch of them! Let's get at least 2 or 3 in here.

 

[Pass2Run]

WR-after the top 4, big drop-off.

RB-although a depth class, cannot wait to the 5th rd and hope a quality back is still available.

CB-who knows when Diggs returns, big hole in the slot. Good depth, but they need a corner who can play snaps year 1.

Would like to add a NT, LB, maybe edge, but with just 3 top 100 picks will be hard to address

I'd say 4: DT, WR, CB, RB in that order of need. You could even put OL before RB if you believe it all starts up front.

Emmitt Smith would have never been as successful without his line. Nate, Larry, Eric, Mark and Mark. Not to mention he had Novacek and Moose.

People overrate Emmitt, imo. The only reason he got the rushing record was because that was winning in Jerry's mind. Great marketing of an overrated player.

If a Lamb or Parsons is there at any position, they should take them regardless of their position.

Bolster the line and the runs will come. The other thing is, most RBs develop faster than OL..so don't put the cart before the horse. You'll be developing offensive line while beating up your RB's durability like Zeke, although his decline was more self induced than anything.

We need big time players.

 

[reddyuta]

WR-after the top 4, big drop-off.

RB-although a depth class, cannot wait to the 5th rd and hope a quality back is still available.

CB-who knows when Diggs returns, big hole in the slot. Good depth, but they need a corner who can play snaps year 1.

Would like to add a NT, LB, maybe edge, but with just 3 top 100 picks will be hard to address

i bet the Cowboys are thinking the same about WR,if they stay at 12 they will most likely get the best WR in the draft,if they pass on WR they will likely be picking the 5th or 6th best WR in he draft.

 

[baltcowboy]

WR-after the top 4, big drop-off.

RB-although a depth class, cannot wait to the 5th rd and hope a quality back is still available.

CB-who knows when Diggs returns, big hole in the slot. Good depth, but they need a corner who can play snaps year 1.

Would like to add a NT, LB, maybe edge, but with just 3 top 100 picks will be hard to address

I think they draft a receiver in the first but if they think Diggs will miss most of the season, cornerback will be drafted before running back. Jane said they love the Virginia Tech kid. I just don’t think they can pass on a Revel or Amos if they are there at 44. The Cowboys want a trade back so bad to get a top 75 extra pick.

 

[Coogiguy03]

Campbell
Flournoy
Lamb
Mingo
Tolbert
Turpin


Which 4?

yeah they're really going to try and sell us on those guys watch!!

 

[cnuball21]

I think WR, DT and RB in that order gives us the. est chance to maximize value.

1 - Tet
2 - Ty. Williams / Harmon
3 - Thuten / Judkins

Something like this would make me happy.

 

[Risen Star]

Take the highest graded player at each pick. Let need factor in when there are more than one on the board at the pick. Do not let your current state of the roster *******ize your future and stock buying in the draft.

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

It seems like Tet is probably considered the best wr. I don’t know where he goes. He could go 4. I could see Dallas passing .

 

[Cowboyny]

I am not sure that our FO see's it that way.

1. We traded for a WR, supposedly for the future.
2. We picked up 2 RB's in FA. Are they going to completely abandon their RB by committee theory from last year?
3. We traded for a CB and they expect Carson to step up.

With all the holes we have, there is a legit argument for OL, DT and DE.

We keep talking about being more physical and running the ball. How does drafting a WR, RB and CB aline with that?

You can never count out a TE with GM Jethro.

These are all depth, short-term pieces that are not even guaranteed roster spots.

 

[dupree89]

yeah they're really going to try and sell us on those guys watch!!

but they can't fool the Coog!

 

[Cowboyny]

I think WR, DT and RB in that order gives us the. est chance to maximize value.

1 - Tet
2 - Ty. Williams / Harmon
3 - Thuten / Judkins

Something like this would make me happy.

Is is their doing, they created these huge holes in the roster where they have to draft for need

As soon as OSA was resigned, I knew they weren’t considering a high DT. I am expecting them to throw another late rd pick at the position and sign another aging veteran.

I really want the UCLA linebacker, but I cannot envision they can make that pick without adding more selections. Giving up their 4th absolutely is going to limit them, especially where they could address their rb or corner need, but probably long gone in the 5th.

 

[Cowboyny]

I think they draft a receiver in the first but if they think Diggs will miss most of the season, cornerback will be drafted before running back. Jane said they love the Virginia Tech kid. I just don’t think they can pass on a Revel or Amos if they are there at 44. The Cowboys want a trade back so bad to get a top 75 extra pick.

Almost have no choice, even should consider less to bail. They could of fill some of these holes in fa, but decided against it, now they are forced to draft for need

 

[Cowboyny]

i bet the Cowboys are thinking the same about WR,if they stay at 12 they will most likely get the best WR in the draft,if they pass on WR they will likely be picking the 5th or 6th best WR in he draft.

Will those 2nd rd receivers be upgraded over what they already have?

 

[Cowboyny]

I'd say 4: DT, WR, CB, RB in that order of need. You could even put OL before RB if you believe it all starts up front.

Emmitt Smith would have never been as successful without his line. Nate, Larry, Eric, Mark and Mark. Not to mention he had Novacek and Moose.

People overrate Emmitt, imo. The only reason he got the rushing record was because that was winning in Jerry's mind. Great marketing of an overrated player.

If a Lamb or Parsons is there at any position, they should take them regardless of their position.

Bolster the line and the runs will come. The other thing is, most RBs develop faster than OL..so don't put the cart before the horse. You'll be developing offensive line while beating up your RB's durability like Zeke, although his decline was more self induced than anything.

We need big time players.

The 90’s OL didn’t have a Single 1st rd pick, they coaches need to start developing these players and create a cohesive line. Don’t need 5 first rd picks.

This front office just doesn’t value the nt position. I am expecting another late rd pick and adding an aging veteran and them saying again we need to fix our run defense. They could of easily filled that need in fa but they decided against it once again