Battlefield 3. Better than COD?

nyc;3971962 said:
IMO FPS suck horribly on the console. PC is the way to go. Console's are for games like Mortal Kombat types and sports games.
PC is the way to but developers know consoles is where the money is. Most gamers just aren't gonna spend $1000+ for a top notch gaming CPU.

Those graphics on those BF3 trailers prob would cost twice that.
 
Everlastingxxx;3971795 said:
On the PS3 you could not go prone. http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Bad-Company-2-Will-Never-Go-Prone-22602.htmlI also seemed to struggle with accuracy. I couldn’t anyone with the sniper rifle to save my life. I also thought the graphics were not impressive.

That said, i also not impressed with COD on the PS3. On the Mac COD is awesome. Much easier to shoot with a mouse, at least for me.

Oh, you meant Battlefield Bad Company 2, not Battlefield 2.

Sniping in Bad Company 2 is MAD easy. Most people that complain about not being able to hit anyone at long range in BC2 aren't accounting for bullet drop over distance correctly (or at all). Once you figure that out, racking up headshots doesnt take much effort.

<rant>
Sniping in BC2 sucks. Stupid camping kid snipers only care about kills, they don't even bother to spot. One of the most useful classes in the game because of the ability to throw motion sensors to assist teammates in attack/defense, and all the kiddies care about is headshots and mortaring crates.
</rant>
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,441
Messages
13,874,687
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top