Championship Game Mock Draft

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,766
Reaction score
95,313
Used NFL Mock Draft Database. Traded 24 to move down to 29 and picked up another third. They seem to estimate comp picks so I just went with the picks they had:

29 - Guyton, OT, OU
56 - Frazier, C, WVU
87 - Bullard, S, UGA (doubt he falls anywhere near this)
92 - McKinnley, DT, A&M
172 - Ford, LB, UT
212 - Ali, TB, Marshall
230 - Milton, TB, UGA
241 - Rosemy-Jacksaint, WR, UGA
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
9,813
Like the players but the idea of starting 2 rookies on the OL of a win now team is terrifying.

Would also hope we attack FA for defense in this kind of scenario.
 

Sully

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
1,863
Used NFL Mock Draft Database. Traded 24 to move down to 29 and picked up another third. They seem to estimate comp picks so I just went with the picks they had:

29 - Guyton, OT, OU
56 - Frazier, C, WVU
87 - Bullard, S, UGA (doubt he falls anywhere near this)
92 - McKinnley, DT, A&M
172 - Ford, LB, UT
212 - Ali, TB, Marshall
230 - Milton, TB, UGA
241 - Rosemy-Jacksaint, WR, UGA
First: Love the idea of trading down but still remaining in the 1st round so to keep that 5th yr option. Dallas needs to get picks to replace the ones they traded away
Second: OT in 1st rd is great. If you try to get a center, in the 1st rd, the OT depth, in the draft, will be gone. Guyton or Morgan. Can not depend on Tyron Smith anymore. Didn't address it last season.
Third: Also agree. MUST MUST MUST fix this OL. This team has to be able to take pressure off the QB. Dallas has struggled to run the ball for three years
Fourth: With the 87th pick, I say LB. Have to stop the run. Cowbys need a MLB that is demanding / physical
Fifth: With the added 3rd rd pick, think you can grab a solid RB, if not, I would add yet another LB
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,906
Reaction score
16,418
Used NFL Mock Draft Database. Traded 24 to move down to 29 and picked up another third. They seem to estimate comp picks so I just went with the picks they had:

29 - Guyton, OT, OU
56 - Frazier, C, WVU
87 - Bullard, S, UGA (doubt he falls anywhere near this)
92 - McKinnley, DT, A&M
172 - Ford, LB, UT
212 - Ali, TB, Marshall
230 - Milton, TB, UGA
241 - Rosemy-Jacksaint, WR, UGA
29 Jackson Powers-Johnson, c, Oregon
56 Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,766
Reaction score
95,313
Love Guyon and Frazier. I’m gonna need a RB earlier than that though.
That was my plan as I was hoping someone like Estime or the kid from Wiscy would be there late in the 3rd but both were gone. So I just took the best player available.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,669
Reaction score
38,270
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Like the players but the idea of starting 2 rookies on the OL of a win now team is terrifying.

Would also hope we attack FA for defense in this kind of scenario.
I think there good chance you sit Guyton or any OT for a year. I call it The Walker Little Plan (granted Little was a high 2nd), and I think its something we should be open too
 

TasteMyScythe

Well-Known Member
Messages
314
Reaction score
329
I think there good chance you sit Guyton or any OT for a year. I call it The Walker Little Plan (granted Little was a high 2nd), and I think its something we should be open too
I say, resign Tyron and try and trade Steele and let a rookie play on the right side for a year or two.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,669
Reaction score
38,270
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I say, resign Tyron and try and trade Steele and let a rookie play on the right side for a year or two.
I think we stuck with Steele for at least a season. His extention kicks in this year, so I think trading him in 2024 would be difficult cap wise. However I dont see any reason a draft pick couldnt compete with Steele at RT if Tyron is back
 

TasteMyScythe

Well-Known Member
Messages
314
Reaction score
329
I agree...and maybe Steele will come back in to form. But, if they are able to dump his contract for a 4th or a 5th rounder they should do it.

I think Gallup is another one they should try to move... just to free up some cap room and get Tolbert and Brooks on the field.
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,669
Reaction score
38,270
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I agree...and maybe Steele will come back in to form. But, if they are able to dump his contract for a 4th or a 5th rounder they should do it.

I think Gallup is another one they should try to move... just to free up some cap room and get Tolbert and Brooks on the field.
I think Gallup is as good as cut
 

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,669
Reaction score
38,270
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Used NFL Mock Draft Database. Traded 24 to move down to 29 and picked up another third. They seem to estimate comp picks so I just went with the picks they had:

29 - Guyton, OT, OU
56 - Frazier, C, WVU
87 - Bullard, S, UGA (doubt he falls anywhere near this)
92 - McKinnley, DT, A&M
172 - Ford, LB, UT
212 - Ali, TB, Marshall
230 - Milton, TB, UGA
241 - Rosemy-Jacksaint, WR, UGA
Very good draft. Dont know that I love a S in the third, but Bullard would be great value
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,766
Reaction score
95,313
29 Jackson Powers-Johnson, c, Oregon
56 Cedrick Gray, lb, North Carolina
The problem is taking a 2nd round player in the first round.

You could likely get a very good C prospect at 56 and still come away with a high level player in the first. Taking the Oregon at 1 is a need pick.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
9,813
I think there good chance you sit Guyton or any OT for a year. I call it The Walker Little Plan (granted Little was a high 2nd), and I think its something we should be open too
I’m def bringing Tyron back. Certainly not opposed to an OT in round 1 if it’s BPA but if we do I want him competing for our RT job year 1…weakest link on the line this past season.
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,906
Reaction score
16,418
The problem is taking a 2nd round player in the first round.

You could likely get a very good C prospect at 56 and still come away with a high level player in the first. Taking the Oregon at 1 is a need pick.
Brugler had him going 21 to the Dolphins in his mock.
 
Top