Close to time Mock

[Sandyf]

Miami trades with New England from 6 to 15, wants to trade back to get Waddle, Dallas gets 15, 35, 50 for 10, Schultz and McGovern.
15. Jaycee Horn CB
26. Trevor Moehrig S (Dallas trades 44 and Gallup for 26)
35. Zaven Collins LB (not my choice but they seem to like him)
50. Alim McNeil DT
75. Walker Little OT
99. Paulson Adebo CB
100. Mavin Wilson DT (trade with Titans)
115. Elerson Smith DE
179. Tamorrion Terry WR
192. Sam Ehlinger QB
239. Robert Hainsey OG

 

[Future]

I like the players for the most part, but those trades don't make much sense.

The first isn't realistic - Schultz and McGovern have 0 trade value, especially for Miami. Not only would Cleveland have no interest in Gallup, but that's really poor value for Dallas.

 

[morasp]

good players, good draft

 

[charron]

So in the last year of williams deal you trade the main backup at G/C and do not draft an option untill pick 239. Don't forget Biadich (however its spelled) missed a few games due to injury last year. same with Jarwin, you are counting on him playing 17 games after missing most of last season with no backup? I like some of the players drafted but not trading away some of our players without replacing them.

 

[gimmesix]

Miami trades with New England from 6 to 15, wants to trade back to get Waddle, Dallas gets 15, 35, 50 for 10, Schultz and McGovern.
15. Jaycee Horn CB
26. Trevor Moehrig S (Dallas trades 44 and Gallup for 26)
35. Zaven Collins LB (not my choice but they seem to like him)
50. Alim McNeil DT
75. Walker Little OT
99. Paulson Adebo CB
100. Mavin Wilson DT (trade with Titans)
115. Elerson Smith DE
179. Tamorrion Terry WR
192. Sam Ehlinger QB
239. Robert Hainsey OG

Not sure why we would trade our starting tight end since we don't pick one up in your draft. You counting on Blake Jarwin coming off injury as your starter?

I know the idea is that we need defense, but we don't need to hurt the offense while doing it. If you trade McGovern, then you are going to have to get a starting guard next year when Williams leaves. If you trade Gallup, then you need at least a No. 3 receiver now. If you trade Schultz, you need at least a TE in the draft who can compete to start.

Or maybe you are one of those who think later-round draft picks are shoe-ins to replace starters.

 

[gimmesix]

I like the players for the most part, but those trades don't make much sense.

The first isn't realistic - Schultz and McGovern have 0 trade value, especially for Miami. Not only would Cleveland have no interest in Gallup, but that's really poor value for Dallas.

Didn't even worry about the value. We can't trade away players without having their replacements on hand. For example, if Pitts fell to us at 10 and we took him, it would make absolute sense to try to trade Schultz for whatever we could get. Unlike you, I think the TE who was tied for fifth in the league last year in receptions by a tight end (mostly without his No. 1 QB) does have trade value, I'm just not sure how much. But we can't trade him without a bona fide replacement.

 

[Future]

Didn't even worry about the value. We can't trade away players without having their replacements on hand. For example, if Pitts fell to us at 10 and we took him, it would make absolute sense to try to trade Schultz for whatever we could get. Unlike you, I think the TE who was tied for fifth in the league last year in receptions by a tight end (mostly without his No. 1 QB) does have trade value, I'm just not sure how much. But we can't trade him without a bona fide replacement.

Nah, Schultz is a bona fide replacement. You'd be lucky to get a 5th for him. It's easy to find replacements for replacement-level players, but that's why they have no trade value.

He was only 5th in catches because all the other TEs got hurt lol. He was 11th in catches per game.