fivetwos
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,736
- Reaction score
- 28,591
Garrett did the same crap we seem to be doing lately with taking the ball when winning the toss. It’s making me wonder if it’s not an organizational thing (Jerry’s orders), but that’s for another time.
If we lose the toss, SF is deferring like most well coached teams do. Nothing can be done there.
We do play differently with a lead on both sides of the ball, so I figure that rather than our staff being full morons, and/or not a Jerry order….we don’t defer when winning the toss because they want to try to jump out to a lead. Only plausible explanation.
BUT…in this game….IF they can help it…you cannot let that SF defense with much help from the crowd, dictate the tone from the beginning.
Especially when you insist on handing Elliott the ball early. It has three and out written all over it and I hope the philosophy changes for this game.
I mean, an incompletion and an Elliott one yard gain are pretty much guaranteed to be the first two plays. Let’s not just hand them momentum….as well as the ball to start the second half.
If we lose the toss, SF is deferring like most well coached teams do. Nothing can be done there.
We do play differently with a lead on both sides of the ball, so I figure that rather than our staff being full morons, and/or not a Jerry order….we don’t defer when winning the toss because they want to try to jump out to a lead. Only plausible explanation.
BUT…in this game….IF they can help it…you cannot let that SF defense with much help from the crowd, dictate the tone from the beginning.
Especially when you insist on handing Elliott the ball early. It has three and out written all over it and I hope the philosophy changes for this game.
I mean, an incompletion and an Elliott one yard gain are pretty much guaranteed to be the first two plays. Let’s not just hand them momentum….as well as the ball to start the second half.