Conan The Barbarian Trailer

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,310
Reaction score
398
Does this show come on after Zena: Warrior Princess???
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
63,151
Reaction score
65,923
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This role is custom made for Jason Momoa. I enjoyed his role as Ronon on Stargate Atlantis: lots of hand-to-hand fighting, swordplay and very little dialogue.

Newcomers may find him a bit smaller for the role of Conan, but it's probably because Arnold Schwarzenegger's image has been so ingrained into us. He does have the physique to pull it off.
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
It goes without saying that the special effects will be greatly improved in this new version, but I can't for the life of me imagine that any other part of this movie won't be greatly disappointing.

The actor playing Conan is too scrawny, to coherent, and too damn pretty.

Lame. I'll watch the originals again...and again. See sig.
 

arglebargle

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,373
Reaction score
409
DallasEast;3971368 said:
This role is custom made for Jason Momoa. I enjoyed his role as Ronon on Stargate Atlantis: lots of hand-to-hand fighting, swordplay and very little dialogue.

Newcomers may find him a bit smaller for the role of Conan, but it's probably because Arnold Schwarzenegger's image has been so ingrained into us. He does have the physique to pull it off.

If you read the books, the Schwarzenegger style Conan is actually the one that's off. Conan is described, not as some muscle pumped bear, but as a panther. IIRC Schwarzenegger lost 30-40 pounds for the second film, as well. The Conan films were kinda turgid potboilers anyway, so this new one has a low bar to shoot for.
 

kmp77

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,310
Reaction score
398
arglebargle;3971471 said:
If you read the books, the Schwarzenegger style Conan is actually the one that's off. Conan is described, not as some muscle pumped bear, but as a panther. IIRC Schwarzenegger lost 30-40 pounds for the second film, as well. The Conan films were kinda turgid potboilers anyway, so this new one has a low bar to shoot for.

The first Arnold film, Conan The Barbarian, was great! One of my fav films of all time. It also had one of the best movie scores of all time. The second film was absolute crud though.
 

cowboys#1

Finish!
Messages
2,468
Reaction score
131
another dumb CGI filled remake.

they wont even use the original music.

lol @hollywood
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
I'll watch it, I've got no problem with an action movie for the sake of action. Same reason I'll probably see Immortals, even though it's 300 2.
 

arglebargle

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,373
Reaction score
409
kmp77;3971566 said:
The first Arnold film, Conan The Barbarian, was great! One of my fav films of all time. It also had one of the best movie scores of all time. The second film was absolute crud though.

My beef with the film comes largely because of changes made from the books. Milius (who I usually like or appreciate) made some really dumb changes, imo. Conan as a slave, worked endlessly to bulk up? Nothing like that in the books. In the books Conan was a dexterous, sometimes foolhardy teenager, come south to escape trouble and make his fortune. Etc.

Milius added all sorts of junk to the movie, stuff that wasn't that helpful. Guess he felt the need to whizz on it, to leave his mark.

The trailer for the new one is not impressing me. Momoa looks just fine, but I suspect the new producers/director will be doing their own bit of whizz bang on it. Hope it turns out to be okay, despite the 'actioneer of the week' trailer campaign.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
In the books, Conan was supposed to be near 7 foot and very muscular. This casting does not fit that but then again, it would be hard to find anybody who fits that.

He was also not particularly attractive in the books. This casting doesn't fit that at all. That's Hollywood.
 

arglebargle

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,373
Reaction score
409
ABQCOWBOY;3973643 said:
In the books, Conan was supposed to be near 7 foot and very muscular. This casting does not fit that but then again, it would be hard to find anybody who fits that.

He was also not particularly attractive in the books. This casting doesn't fit that at all. That's Hollywood.

He's referred to as a panther.... Not exactly the bear that he was in the first film. Even if you were to take that as a jaguar (pretty much the most muscled up of the big cats), it's not exactly Arnold. Not that I really have complaints against him, he plays tough real well. And has comedic timing! Who would have guessed?

Yeah, you do have to throw out anything like the 7' requirement.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
49,208
Reaction score
32,859
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Conan in the book

Conan9.gif
 

arglebargle

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,373
Reaction score
409
Well, looks like both views have the day! Depends on the era it appears.

"...Conan is described as standing 6 feet (1.8 m) and weighing 180 pounds (82 kg) when he takes part in an attack on Venarium at only 15 years old, though being far from fully grown. Although Conan is muscular, Howard frequently compares his agility and way of moving to that of a panther."

and,

"During his reign as king of Aquilonia, Conan was "... a tall man, mightily shouldered and deep of chest, with a massive corded neck and heavily muscled limbs.""

It was also mentioned that no man was ever described as stronger than Conan, though some where noted to be bigger or larger.
 

Dodger

Indomitable
Messages
4,216
Reaction score
43
Some movies just shouldn't be remade...this is one of them.

JMO...
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Dodger;3973851 said:
Some movies just shouldn't be remade...this is one of them.

JMO...

I hear you but this is Conan the barbarian we're talking about, not Citizen Cane.
 
Top