Cowboys last in the league in cash spending for 2022 season

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,152
Reaction score
38,759
Jethro Jones and Cheapskate Son are very effective in running the business side of the Cowboys .

Unfortunately building a championship caliber team isn’t as much of a priority.

And as long as the record revenue continues no reason to change .

6pVZJix.jpg
 

ThatJerryKid

cowboys31
Messages
3,228
Reaction score
7,502
In the comment section:

What's the point of this? If every team is required to spend the same amount over the long term, single year cash flow is meaningless. If a team didn't spend much this year, it just means their spending is higher the year before or after. It's impossible for a team to be "cheap".
 

Aerolithe_Lion

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,687
Reaction score
12,806
In the comment section:

What's the point of this? If every team is required to spend the same amount over the long term, single year cash flow is meaningless. If a team didn't spend much this year, it just means their spending is higher the year before or after. It's impossible for a team to be "cheap".
This is very true, but it may be indicative of “windows”. A team pumping out a lot of signing bonuses and restructures in a certain can mean they’re trying to short term push their cap to fit more talent in, and it’d show a bloated number on this report
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
One (aka Jerry) could argue that he was able to be last in cash spending yet saw the team go 12-5 in back-to-back seasons thereby being 'relevant' yet coming up short in the playoffs yet again.
There are many teams listed that seemingly spent much more than failed to do anything.If you look at Carolina for example they supposedly spent $50M more than Dallas and their return was to finish with the #9 overall draft pick, which they just traded up to #1 and had to mortgage not only their #9 pick this year but also their #61 pick this year as well as their 1st round pick next year, their 2nd round pick in 2025, and their #1 WR......so you could argue that spending more does not equal team success and at times (in the case of the Panthers) spending more has cost them their future.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,492
Reaction score
94,767
I’m assuming this is because it doesn’t take into account signing bonuses that would have been payed upfront previously??
It kind of does.

These things can be timing issues more than anything. If you pay a player a massive signing bonus one year and then his base is low the next year, it would show low cash in that year.

So this number for the Cowboys is both in part timing and also general cheapness on the Jones' part because they eschew paying bigger FA contracts that often involve fairly large cash signing bonuses.
 
Top