All the Dak haters are mumbling incoherently amongst themselves and at least temporarily, sparing us there bull poop they were trying to spew.
Grammar police alert.If you are going to insult people use proper grammar when doing it as it's their and not there.
That said, why would supposed 'Dak haters' (a grown man actually spewing that infantile garbage) be upset when Dallas has a 4-2 record in Dak's absence and competing for the NFC East?
Think before typing.
Also, I didn’t insult anyone. Don’t be a drama Queen. Ok, that’s a little dig but jeez put your big Army pants on.If you are going to insult people use proper grammar when doing it as it's their and not there.
That said, why would supposed 'Dak haters' (a grown man actually spewing that infantile garbage) be upset when Dallas has a 4-2 record in Dak's absence and competing for the NFC East?
Think before typing.
Sad huh.Let's roll you big **'er...best shape of your life.
Grammar police alert.
I didn’t say you were upset, just that you were totally wrong. Are you man enough to admit it?
You were wrong about Rush being better than Dak. I knew you weren’t going to admit you were wrong.Wrong about what? I along with many didn't think Dallas would go 4-1 with Rush so yes, I was wrong about that.
The sad part is that you focus so much on divisiveness that you fail to see while many are critical of Dak and may not think he ultimately is the QB to lead us to a Super Bowl, we also recognize Rush isn't that QB only and what many were happy about (even people that disagree with one another on the subject of Dak) when Rush took over was the offensive approach that was being utilized: a rush first, avoid mistakes type offense that was secondary to the defense. We all saw that recipe succeed in 2016 with Dak at QB and recognized that he was a better fit for that approach than Romo and it is the type of system and team success we focus on and not so-called "Dak hate" as you and others would claim.
Sad huh.