Dak vs. Hurts

StarOfGlory

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,505
Reaction score
4,820
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
 

acr731

Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
Messages
10,106
Reaction score
28,047
How about you wait until Dak get's to a super bowl before making a comparison like this?

Oh nooooooooooooooo, another player made a bad play IN THE SUPER BOWL. Meanwhile, little Dakkie can't even get to the NFCCG.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,518
Reaction score
4,754
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
A bit confused with what or who you're trying to troll, but Hurts played to an outstanding 79.7 QBR, the fumble wasnt game changing, and he came back and the Egg's score two TD's after the fumble.
 

StarOfGlory

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,505
Reaction score
4,820
A bit confused with what or who you're trying to troll, but Hurts played to an outstanding 79.7 QBR, the fumble wasnt game changing, and he came back and the Egg's score two TD's after the fumble.
Do you think the Eagles lose without that fumble? I don’t. And yes, Dak hasn’t made it to the Super Bowl, and Hurts played a very good game overall. Still, that fumble was a killer in the end. I will say Hurts is the better QB now.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,518
Reaction score
4,754
Do you think the Eagles lose without that fumble? I don’t. And yes, Dak hasn’t made it to the Super Bowl, and Hurts played a very good game overall. Still, that fumble was a killer in the end. I will say Hurts is the better QB now.
So you're saying a QB has to be perfect, or he's blamed. If Hurts had melted away after the mistake (ala what Dak gets a accused of) you may have a point, but he didnt so you're wrong.....he just played against the best QB in the NFL who played to an unworldly 96.4 QBR.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,055
Reaction score
17,763
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
Hurts made me a believer last night but the difference in the game was Mahomes. The game reminded me of Dak vs Rodgers in the 2016 playoffs. The Cowboys/Eagles had superior talent but Rodgers/Mahomes were elite quarterbacks.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,518
Reaction score
4,754
The fumble return TD, in a game in which they lost by 3, wasn't game-changing?
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Hurts subsequently took them to a 10 pts lead. It's how he handled the mistake, he didnt capitulate like certain QB's.

Trying watching the game, rather than find an angle to try and support a bias. Hurts played well, he made a mistake, put it behind him, gathered his team to take a 10 pt lead and ultimately lost to a QB who was neigh on perfect.

I cant see how that game elevates Dak in any way.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,720
Reaction score
50,189
I guess you have to take the consolation prizes when they present themselves, right? Dak did get on the field at the super bowl, though. He was in street clothes, but he can say he was actually on the field at a super bowl.
Better than your hero.
 

raven55

Well-Known Member
Messages
804
Reaction score
319
dak and romo are cut from the same cloth they like running up there stats on teams of lesser talent or hurt teams but when push comes to shove they choke maybe that was something dak learned from romo. remember romo held the ball for a kicker to win the game an oops he dropped it and dak one up him by throwing 2 interceptions so dak is a better choker anyway
 

unionjack8

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,351
Reaction score
26,999
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
Man, step back and read what you just read
 

raven55

Well-Known Member
Messages
804
Reaction score
319
speaking of morons that don't read you who posted above must have finished the 2 grade in reading huh
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,834
Reaction score
37,296
They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
Hurts is in year 2 and has gone to the SB. Dak is now going on into year 8. The criticism of Dak extends the length of his career.

Hurt was complete garbage his first season, while his second season, considering his overall skill-set, was lights out and I’m not even a fan. I thought he sucked after year 1 and Dak was better, but after his first year Hurts showed his is way better than Dak, though Hurts play is exaggerated by what surrounds him, but the same with Dak his whole career here.

Dak was a COMPLETE MESS his second season.

You Dak-zealots and your analogies are literally off the wall and it’s embarrassing.
 
Top