Funny, not one Terry Glenn thread now....

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
that Hurd and Crayton filled in just fine.very interesting.We dont need Glenn,but he is another luxury if he comes back.I have total faith in Hurd and Crayton though.They stepped up and so did Reeves for the most part considering he was on one of the NFL top reciever in Burress.We get Newman back and gel a bit lookout.
 
All the Chicken littles have switched too Roy's coverage .....
 
we are beyond the point where we should gauge our progress against bad teams or bad defenses....this is about winning it all....when we face the Bears or the Pats defense...then we will know who we need/don't need.
 
yep... none of them will fess up and eat their share of crow!:D
 
We shall overcome:starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin
 
Hey, I was one to give the young'ens a chance....but I'm not naive enough to say all is well after one game against one of the more pitiful defensive displays since, well, us against the Saints or Detroit last year.
 
zrinkill;1641138 said:
All the Chicken littles have switched too Roy's coverage .....

Well, Roy hasn't covered since he first came into the league. Nothing new, just one of biggest problems now.
 
One game.

I'm a huge supporter of Hurd and like Crayton a lot too but Terry Glenn might put us over the top.
 
juckie;1641135 said:
that Hurd and Crayton filled in just fine.very interesting.We dont need Glenn,but he is another luxury if he comes back.I have total faith in Hurd and Crayton though.They stepped up and so did Reeves for the most part considering he was on one of the NFL top reciever in Burress.We get Newman back and gel a bit lookout.

Well, I agree to most of it, but Reeves wasnt great, was below average to my liking but as you point out, he was out with Burress who´s a great receiver... Lets see how he does with some other worse receivers.
 
CATCH17;1641200 said:
One game.

I'm a huge supporter of Hurd and like Crayton a lot too but Terry Glenn might put us over the top.
I'm with you on this one. Imagine the possibilities with this OC, these weapons and a healthy Glenn. I'd LOVE for him to come back and contribute this season, but his long-term health is most important.
 
please dont kick a bees nest...leave it alone..

Its like stepping on a fire ant pile...

just dont do it...
 
Parche;1641275 said:
Well, I agree to most of it, but Reeves wasnt great, was below average to my liking but as you point out, he was out with Burress who´s a great receiver... Lets see how he does with some other worse receivers.

I don't care what anyone says, when a guy goes for 8 catches, 144 yards and 3 touchdowns, you did not do a good job.

Plax is a good receiver, but if we're going to say giving up all those pts and yards to a good receiver is passable, we might as well pack it in now.
 
juckie;1641135 said:
that Hurd and Crayton filled in just fine.very interesting.We dont need Glenn,but he is another luxury if he comes back.I have total faith in Hurd and Crayton though.They stepped up and so did Reeves for the most part considering he was on one of the NFL top reciever in Burress.We get Newman back and gel a bit lookout.

Glenn was history when he started being/staying injured. At his age and salary he can't afford to be out lest the youngsters show their stuff.

Aside from the gloating on your part, there is nothing remotely new in your post. Have some imagination, man or don't bother the adults

:cool:
 
bbailey423;1641141 said:
we are beyond the point where we should gauge our progress against bad teams or bad defenses....this is about winning it all....when we face the Bears or the Pats defense...then we will know who we need/don't need.

It's more like when we face the Colts or Patriots OFFENSE...then we will know what we need or don't need.
 
Bach;1641199 said:
Well, Roy hasn't covered since he first came into the league. Nothing new, just one of biggest problems now.

17 int in his career (4 game winning)...... must have been all luck.
 
Coverage isn't all interceptions, would you say Terrance Newman is a bad CB cause he had 1 int last year?
 
TheCount;1644850 said:
Coverage isn't all interceptions, would you say Terrance Newman is a bad CB cause he had 1 int last year?




No ..... but I also would not refer to someone who had as many game changing plays as Roy has had in the secondary as someone who has never covered since he entered the league.
 
juckie;1641135 said:
that Hurd and Crayton filled in just fine.very interesting.We dont need Glenn,but he is another luxury if he comes back.I have total faith in Hurd and Crayton though.They stepped up and so did Reeves for the most part considering he was on one of the NFL top reciever in Burress.We get Newman back and gel a bit lookout.

Plaxico always looks All Pro when he plays the Cowboys
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,925
Messages
13,905,705
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top