Graphic Stat Comparisons: R. Caldwell, K. McCardell, B. Johnson & P. Crayton

Awesome DE!!! Thanks.

Interesting. Looks to me like Caldwell is the most consitent and because he is still young enough to mantain his numbers he is probably the best bet.

He is a decent enough WR. We aren't going to get a top player off waivers.
 
DallasEast;1628246 said:
In my mind's eye, I see all three lines converging... to... unemployment. Fascinating! :)


You did a very good job on that.......interesting.....thanks
 
Sarge;1629178 said:
I prefer pie charts.
You just HAD to say it, didn't you? :rolleyes: :)

Average3.jpg


Longest3.jpg


Receiving3.jpg


Receptions3.jpg


TDs3.jpg


Starting3.jpg
 
There's one thing I think some on here are missing. I don't think bringing in another receiver would inhibit our current receiver's growth. I don't think we bring in anyone that gets Crayton or Hurd's minutes. It's simply a matter of numbers. IF Glenn is out for an extended period of time, we simply need another receiver. Stanback isn't ready to contribute. Bring in Caldwell as a 4th/5th receiver. We don't have to give up anything for him, especially if Glenn goes on the IR. If he doesn't, we'd have to cut one of our 53. I simply think we need another body a that position if Glenn is done for the year or at least half of he year. Caldwell, while not great, has shown he can play by leading the Patriots receivers last year.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,917
Messages
13,905,014
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top