Hargrave or Wilson and Cooks

Wilson had tons of tackles because the line didn’t do their job in the run game. Hargrave solves that.
Not sure about that. Depending on the source Hargrave is only credited with around 30 tackles last year so I'm not sure it changes too much. His numbers in the run game are very comparable to a guy like OSA. The reason Hargrave got paid was he racked up 11 sacks and 57 pressures from an interior DLine spot. Since he arrived to Philly he has not been a monster run game stopper, however I can see the argument that is because of how Philly used him too.
 
Wilson and cooks
Yeah agree, Wilson is as good at his position as Hargrave is plus add a speedy TD machine at WR, which was a catastrophic fail last year…easy choice. Do we still need a DT? Absolutely! But I still think we bring back Hankins for cheap and there isn’t 18m difference.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,253
Messages
13,800,419
Members
23,775
Latest member
KingMe21457
Back
Top