I knew Espn was bad... I didn't think they were this bad

[Cowboys&Caps]

All over this article http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2823703 about the Joey Porter/Levi Jones fight Espn includes quotes from Enquirer magazine. I thought that magazine was stricktly bs and lied about everything. now some will ask "is that not what espn does?" I was hoping not but that was in vain i suppose.

 

[CrazyCowboy]

That was a kick butt fight from all accounts.....it is a wonder on of them did not get hurt.

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

they are pretty tough guys though being a starting NFL linebacker and offensive tackle

 

[AdamJT13]

The article cites the Cincinnati Enquirer (a regular newspaper) not the National Enquirer (the supermarket tabloid).

 

[YosemiteSam]

Personally, I think the whole story is full of lies. Jones, Porter, and ESPN. They all suck of you ask me!

 

[YosemiteSam]

The article cites the Cincinnati Enquirer (a regular newspaper) not the National Enquirer (the supermarket tabloid).

Well, the Philadelphia Enquirer is supposed to be a "regular newspaper", but they employed Screamin A. Smith which automatically makes them a tabloid like the National Enquirer. :laugh1:

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

The article cites the Cincinnati Enquirer (a regular newspaper) not the National Enquirer (the supermarket tabloid).

sheepish look ** i guess I did some ESPN reporting there didn't I?

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

Personally, I think the whole story is full of lies. Jones, Porter, and ESPN. They all suck of you ask me!

Mob!!

Mob!!

i agree with you

 

[fanfromvirginia]

Actually, the National Enquirer is significantly less of a BS rag than it used to be, believe it or not. Still celebrity-based and sleazy but their standards and methods have improved and they occasionally break real stories through real reporting.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Enquirer for details. (Of course Wikipedia could be wrong but this matches up pretty well with what I've heard.)

 

[YosemiteSam]

Actually, the National Enquirer is significantly less of a BS rag than it used to be, believe it or not. Still celebrity-based and sleazy but their standards and methods have improved and they occasionally break real stories through real reporting.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Enquirer for details. (Of course Wikipedia could be wrong but this matches up pretty well with what I've heard.)

The Enquirer is probably the one that filled out Wikipedia. (not that I read the article)

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

Actually, the National Enquirer is significantly less of a BS rag than it used to be, believe it or not. Still celebrity-based and sleazy but their standards and methods have improved and they occasionally break real stories through real reporting.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Enquirer for details. (Of course Wikipedia could be wrong but this matches up pretty well with what I've heard.)

that sucks for them becaue it will be hard to shake the bad air around their name

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

Yea its pretty likely they did that wikipedia article


** you should never cite wikipedia :spanking:

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

Don't love the 6 guys beating down Jones, if true. That's straight out BS but I gotta tell ya. It would be a lie if I said that I didn't enjoy the fight action between two players who face each other in the division. This is throw back stuff. This is how it used to be in the old days when teams didn't change uniforms every 5 minutes. You had a lot of guys who played against each other for a number of years and bad blood naturally happened. You'd have one or two of these things a year. We've moved passed that but I can't say a small part of me doesn't miss that a little bit.

 

[Aikbach]

Did Porter kiss Levi afterwards and say he was his god? No? He must only do that for coaches.