UNDISPUTED.
I agree with 80% of what they're saying.
Remaining 20%, I'm just giving jerry the benefit of the doubt.
They make several points that I, and several others here, have made many times.
UNDISPUTED.
I agree with 80% of what they're saying.
Remaining 20%, I'm just giving jerry the benefit of the doubt.
They make several points that I, and several others here, have made many times.
Wasnt Jimmy leaving a mutual decision though?The last 30 seconds nailed it: if Jimmy sticks around the Cowboys are the Patriots before the Patriots.
That team could've won 5 or 6 Super Bowls. They barely got three, thanks to Neil O'Donnell.
Yet we still have fans who defend Jerry after 25 years of nothing since then.
That was the official reason.Wasnt Jimmy leaving a mutual decision though?
PerhapsThat was the official reason.
Jimmy Johnson wouldn't have walked away so easily from a chance of making history....3-peat...and MAYBE even a 4-peat.
I think the actual story has been well documented and not denied by either.Wasnt Jimmy leaving a mutual decision though?
How much blame falls on many of our fans who keep buying Jerry’s snake oil, jerseys, season tix and $75 parking every Sunday? Stop buying a lousy product. You can still love the Cowboys without buying this overpriced mediocrity. Maybe the old man will look in the mirror when fans stop validating the “emperor’s new clothes”.
80 percent Jerry80 percent jerry. 20 percent Stephen.