M. Faulk

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
you whinny little loser!!! I just wish Dware could punk you ONE MORE TIME!
 
hahaahahhaahaha i'd love to hear what he has to say.
 
guag;3176843 said:
hahaahahhaahaha i'd love to hear what he has to say.

probably something like, "well I need to see how they play next week before I am convinced"

then if we win next week it will be "they have to win a playoff game before I am convinced",,,,,
 
Faulk and Dungy can both eat a big bowl of Shut the **** Up.
 
CanadianCowboysFan;3177004 said:
probably something like, "well I need to see how they play next week before I am convinced"

then if we win next week it will be "they have to win a playoff game before I am convinced",,,,,



Waren Sapp says the same thing
 
You guys are funny.

I think you all care about the mediot and the commentators more than you would have us believe. ;)
 
It was disappointing to hear Faulk pick Washington this morning. That was pretty crazy.
 
well there has been quite an amount of inappropriate *'s in this thread. Its only fair that they all get stern warnings also.

but seriously though i dont like him on that show he's on. His analysis seems sort of slopped together IMO not nearly as good as the other guys. His points are never very clear unless he's making some sort of stupid statement like the one this thread is about. And that ends up being the only thing clear about that statement.,because its usually so dumb it draws attention to the viewer . He seems like he's having some beers at a bar with a friend instead of doing a tv show about football analysis. Great player , horrible Tv show Anchor.
 
LOL, if you Google "Marshall Faulk hates the Cowboys" you will get threads from CowboysZone as the top two results.
 
big dog cowboy;3177207 said:
It was disappointing to hear Faulk pick Washington this morning. That was pretty crazy.

It's because they're not talented enough commentators to analyze teams as they stand at the given moment with week by week improvements (or regressions). Instead they go by trends and tendencies, which we all know can't be relied on, no matter your history.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,833
Messages
13,900,108
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top