Mega Millions mystery: 'Winner' in hiding, co-workers in limbo

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Fifteen Maryland McDonald's employees remain in financial limbo Tuesday as a co-worker who claimed to hold a $105 million Mega Millions lottery ticket stays in hiding amid suspicions she is either being greedy or perpetrating a cruel hoax.

Three winning tickets were bought for Friday's record-breaking $656 million Mega Millions drawing. While no one has come forward to claim the prize, Mirlande Wilson's boasts to a newspaper that she selected the ticket has caused ill-will at a McDonald's in Westport, a section in Baltimore, Md., where she works. Wilson bought tickets for a pool of co-workers, but told the New York Post that the winning ticket she claimed to have purchased was bought separately.

Lottery officials in Maryland, however, downplayed Wilson's claim to the golden ticket without proof.

"Until or unless someone walks through the door with that ticket, and it's verified as the winner, we don't have any lead on anybody," Maryland Lottery spokeswoman Carole Everett told FoxNews.com early Tuesday. "There is a winner somewhere, but we don't know who they are yet."

Attempts to reach Wilson, a Haitian immigrant living in Baltimore, have been unsuccessful. In a statement to The Associated Press, the franchise's owner, Birul Desai, said the Post's report was purely speculation and cautioned anyone from jumping to conclusions until the winning ticket is verified.

Wilson's co-workers are sizzling with anger over the confusion.
"She can't do this to us!” shift manager Suleiman Osman Husein told the New York Post. "We each paid $5. She took everybody’s money!"


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/0...lds-maryland-mystery-continues/#ixzz1r04tjKJI
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
Dopes. It might seem to up the odds of doing this, but if you're self-appointed ticket buyer doesn't make copies of each ticket and pass them around, chances are you're going to get shafted if he/she holds the winning ticket. It's probably best just avoid the whole ugly scene.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
Amazing how the lottery always maanges to select the lowest common denominators of society.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
vta;4491899 said:
Dopes. It might seem to up the odds of doing this, but if you're self-appointed ticket buyer doesn't make copies of each ticket and pass them around, chances are you're going to get shafted if he/she holds the winning ticket. It's probably best just avoid the whole ugly scene.

I agree. We have people who buy into the lottery where I work and the person buying always gives them a copy of the tickets so that they will be able to see if they won. Myself I don't play lottery

I do think if this woman in Maryland did this to her co workers she is a slug. A rich slug but a slug non the less.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,018
Reaction score
23,192
Doomsday101;4491919 said:
I agree. We have people who buy into the lottery where I work and the person buying always gives them a copy of the tickets so that they will be able to see if they won. Myself I don't play lottery

I do think if this woman in Maryland did this to her co workers she is a slug. A rich slug but a slug non the less.
She'll be a sued slug at that.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
speedkilz88;4491935 said:
She'll be a sued slug at that.

If there is no prove it how could they? She could say looked I bought these 5 tickets for our group and this winning ticket was the one I bought for just myself.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Doomsday101;4491940 said:
If there is no prove it how could they? She could say looked I bought these 5 tickets for our group and this winning ticket was the one I bought for just myself.

It will be interesting. She will have the entire store against saying one thing while she says something else. The fact that she already admitted to being involved with the group purchasing will go against her.

If the co-workers can produce a xerox copy of the winning ticket on that list, she has already lost.

Either way, she will have to produce every ticket she purchased for the co-workers AND produce tickets that were not. If the co-workers say they bought 100 tickets. She will have to produce at least 105 tickets.
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
Doomsday101;4491940 said:
If there is no prove it how could they? She could say looked I bought these 5 tickets for our group and this winning ticket was the one I bought for just myself.

Ironically this happened here in NJ just a few weeks ago and the people sued their co-worker successfully. I'm not sure it would guarantee the same outcome, but in this case they guy had to payout to his co-workers.

I'm not sure why someone playing in a pool would want to risk this sort of trouble in the first place. If I were going to bother, I'd buy my tickets on a separate day at a separate store, considering it can be pinpointed which store sold the winner.

People are just crap in so many cases. Like sharing 200 million is a big problem.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
vta;4491967 said:
Ironically this happened here in NJ just a few weeks ago and the people sued their co-worker successfully. I'm not sure it would guarantee the same outcome, but in this case they guy had to payout to his co-workers.

I'm not sure why someone playing in a pool would want to risk this sort of trouble in the first place. If I were going to bother, I'd buy my tickets on a separate day at a separate store, considering it can be pinpointed which store sold the winner.

People are just crap in so many cases. Like sharing 200 million is a big problem.

Their payout will be about $100M.
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
Sam I Am;4491969 said:
Their payout will be about $100M.

$157.8 to be exact. Never the less, broken up between five people it's still more than any of those dopes would earn in a lifetime working at McDonalds.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
vta;4491967 said:
Ironically this happened here in NJ just a few weeks ago and the people sued their co-worker successfully. I'm not sure it would guarantee the same outcome, but in this case they guy had to payout to his co-workers.

I'm not sure why someone playing in a pool would want to risk this sort of trouble in the first place. If I were going to bother, I'd buy my tickets on a separate day at a separate store, considering it can be pinpointed which store sold the winner.

People are just crap in so many cases. Like sharing 200 million is a big problem.

I agree. I could not do that to friends or co workers. The guilt would be too much. Besides as you said sharing 200 million I'll be set up nicely for the rest of my life.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
vta;4491972 said:
$157.8 to be exact. Never the less, broken up between five people it's still more than any of those dopes would earn in a lifetime working at McDonalds.

Is that after state tax? I read a breakdown of it not long ago and after both state and federal tax, it was showing just over $100M. Well, unless the jackpot ended up being even higher than the estimated $640M. I believe it was around $150M after federal, but before state tax.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Doomsday101;4491979 said:
I agree. I could not do that to friends or co workers. The guilt would be too much. Besides as you said sharing 200 million I'll be set up nicely for the rest of my life.

Yet you have no issue running red lights and getting away with not paying a ticket for doing so. :D ;)
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Sam I Am;4491995 said:
Yet you have no issue running red lights and getting away with not paying a ticket for doing so. :D ;)

City would blow the money on stupid things. Besides they are able to hijack tax payers when ever they feel like it.
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
Sam I Am;4491991 said:
Is that after state tax? I read a breakdown of it not long ago and after both state and federal tax, it was showing just over $100M. Well, unless the jackpot ended up being even higher than the estimated $640M. I believe it was around $150M after federal, but before state tax.

The article I read said the total jackpot was 655 million and a lump sum pay-off after the tax rape was 157. I'm not sure it was entirely clear on which state, etc, etc.

Hell, even 100 million. I could split that five ways, dump off a good enough amount to family members and charity and still have enough to go on without a qualm. Or so I think. :) I haven't been there, but I've heard money makes people do crazy things.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,300
Reaction score
7,800
The lump sum after taxes was well over $300 million, but since there were 2 other winners, her share is around $157 million I guess. But as far as the situation goes, without a xerox copy of the winning tickets or some written agreement, the other McDonald's workers won't see a penny. But I'm guessing there is no proof since no one is mentioning it in the article.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
I think it's funny how everyone assumes the lady is lying about buying her own tickets.

I used to be part of a office lottery pool, but I also always bought my own separate tickets. Pretty much everyone in the office bought their own tickets.

I'm sure there's some sort of way to check the reciept of the winning ticket to see if it was part of a batch of 100 bought at once, or if it were part of a batch of 5.

Either way, w/o proof I don't see how any of those McD's employees will ever see a penny.
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
Rack Bauer;4492066 said:
Either way, w/o proof I don't see how any of those McD's employees will ever see a penny.

They did in this case.

No copies were made, but jury still found this guy guilty and awarded his co-workers with 'their share'.

Either way, it's flat out dumb to do it.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,783
Reaction score
86,411
What were the winning numbers?

I want to make sure im checking the right numbers.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,018
Reaction score
23,192
Rack Bauer;4492066 said:
I think it's funny how everyone assumes the lady is lying about buying her own tickets.

I used to be part of a office lottery pool, but I also always bought my own separate tickets. Pretty much everyone in the office bought their own tickets.

I'm sure there's some sort of way to check the reciept of the winning ticket to see if it was part of a batch of 100 bought at once, or if it were part of a batch of 5.

Either way, w/o proof I don't see how any of those McD's employees will ever see a penny.
It's more likely she would have to show proof she bought them separately. She's already admitted that she bought tickets for the group so I think that would put the burden of proof on her.
 
Top