Month 1 Of NBA Season Canceled

Messages
14,208
Reaction score
1
NEW YORK -- The NBA will play a shortened season -- if it plays at all -- after negotiations to end the lockout again stalled over how to divide the league's revenue.

Commissioner David Stern canceled all November games on Friday, the 120th day of the lockout, after a third consecutive day of meetings ended without a deal in sight.

"It's not practical, possible or prudent to have a full season now," said Stern, who previously canceled the first two weeks of the season.

And he repeated his warnings that the offers players have rejected might now get even harsher as the league tries to make up the millions of dollars that will be lost.

"We're going to have to recalculate how bad the damage is," Stern said. "The next offer will reflect the extraordinary losses that are piling up now."

Just a day earlier, Stern had said he would consider it a failure if the two sides didn't reach a deal in the next few days and vowed they would take "one heck of a shot" to get it done.

Although they've narrowed the issues between them to just a handful, the division of revenues remains a huge obstacle.

Owners are insistent on a 50-50 split, while players last formally proposed they get 52.5 percent, leaving them about $100 million apart annually. Players were guaranteed 57 percent in the previous collective bargaining agreement.

The players will not accept a 50-50 split, union executive director Billy Hunter and union president Derek Fisher of the Los Angeles Lakers said.

"Derek and I made it clear that we could not take the 50-50 deal to our membership. Not with all the concessions that we granted," Hunter said. "We said we got to have some dollars."

Instead, they'll now be out roughly $350 million, the losses Hunter previously projected for each month the players were locked out. He hoped a full season could be played if a deal were made this weekend, but Stern emphatically ruled out any hope of that now.

"These are not punitive announcements; these are calendar generated announcements," Stern said.

No further talks have been scheduled.

After two days of making some progress on salary cap issues, the two sides brought the revenue split back into the discussion Friday and promptly got stuck on both issues.

Stern said the NBA owners were "willing" to go to 50 percent, but union executive director Billy Hunter "said that he was not willing to go a penny below 52 (percent)."

"He closed up his book and walked out of the room. And that's where we are," Stern said.

Hunter said the league initially moved its target down to 47 percent during Friday's six-hour session, then returned to its previous proposal of 50 percent of revenues

"We made a lot of concessions, but unfortunately at this time it's not enough, and we're not prepared or unable at this time to move any further," Hunter said.

Fisher said it was difficult to say why talks broke down, or when they would start up again.

"We're here, we've always been here, but today just wasn't the day to try and finish this out," he said.

Fisher said there were still too many system restrictions in the owners' proposal. Players want to keep a system similar to the old one, and fear owners' ideas would limit player movement.

And though they might be inclined to give up one if they received more concessions on the other, players make it sound as if they are the ones doing all the giving back.

The old cap system allowed teams to exceed it through the use of a number of exceptions, many of which the league wants to tweak or even eliminate. Hunter has called a hard cap a "blood issue" to players, and though the league has backed off its initial proposal calling for one, players think the changes owners want would work like one.

"We've told them that we don't want a hard cap. We don't want a hard cap any kind of way, either an obvious hard cap or a hard cap that may not be as obvious to most people but we know it works like a hard cap," Hunter said. "And so you get there, and then all of a sudden they say, 'Well, we also have to have our number.' And you say, 'Well wait a minute, you're not negotiating in good faith."

But if players think what's being proposed is a hard cap, here's another warning: Deputy commissioner Adam Silver won't rule out the league seeking one.

"Our response is then let's have a hard cap, which is what we wanted," he said.

"We don't think it's a hard cap. ... We've all been wasting our time if they believe this is a hard cap. We've been spending literally hundreds of hours negotiating the specifics of a system, where they're now saying is the equivalent of a hard cap. We've been clear from the beginning from a league standpoint we would prefer a hard cap."

When players offered to reduce their guarantee from 57 percent to 53 percent, Hunter said that would have transferred about $1.1 billion to owners over six years. Now, at 52.5, he said that would grow to more than $1.5 billion.

But even a 50-50 split would be too high for some hardline owners, because it would reduce only $280 million of the $300 million they said they lost last season. Owners initially proposed a BRI split that players said would have had them around 40 percent.

Though they will miss a paycheck on Nov. 15, Hunter said each player would have received a minimum of $100,000 from the escrow money that was returned to them to make up the difference after salaries fell short of the guaranteed 57 percent of revenues last season.

The small groups that were meeting grew a bit Friday. Union vice presidents Chris Paul -- wearing a Yankees cap for his trip to New York -- and Theo Ratliff joined the talks, and economist Kevin Murphy returned after he was unavailable Thursday. Mavericks owner Mark Cuban stayed for the session after taking part Thursday.

:banghead:
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,300
Reaction score
7,800
unlike with the nfl lockout, i think the owners should hold out till they get it right. but i also hope the players don't agree to any deal w/o a better revenue sharing model.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
good, the players don't even give a crap till after Christmas anyway.
 
Messages
14,208
Reaction score
1
jimmy40;4208268 said:
I hope they cancel all the games till after the Super Bowl.

Why? It's not like it interferes with football. Everyone's eyes including mine will be more focused on the NFL than the NBA anyway.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Dallas Cowboys Fan;4208288 said:
Why? It's not like it interferes with football. Everyone's eyes including mine will be more focused on the NFL than the NBA anyway.
it interferes with my football news on Sportcenter, the ticker on the bottom of the screen etc.
 

Rogah

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,473
Reaction score
793
Dallas Cowboys Fan;4207675 said:
The bi-weekly cancellations are just P.R. moves that don't mean a darn thing. They already cancelled the first two weeks of the season but everyone was saying that if a deal was struck yesterday we still would have seen a full slate of 82 games.

Since yesterday's session were an epic fail, Stern figured why not announce more cancellations... So ESPN gives us a list of all the marquee games being missed. But the list is pointless since, if/when they do get a new CBA, an entirely new schedule will be drawn up. They're not just going to pick up the current schedule starting December 15th (for example).
 

Rogah

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,473
Reaction score
793
Manwiththeplan;4207985 said:
unlike with the nfl lockout, i think the owners should hold out till they get it right. but i also hope the players don't agree to any deal w/o a better revenue sharing model.
The key difference between this and football is the a solid number of NBA owners are losing real money on an annual basis. That just wasn't the case in football.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
doesn't matter if they play 82 or 10 the same teams are going to be in the playoffs as always.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Manwiththeplan;4207985 said:
unlike with the nfl lockout, i think the owners should hold out till they get it right. but i also hope the players don't agree to any deal w/o a better revenue sharing model.

What, in your opinion, would represent a better revenue sharing model?
 
Top