vta;3849843 said:
A lot of great shots, but frankly I'm getting pretty tired of tragedy and grief taking center stage in these photo contests. Nat Geo, Smithsonian, etc, it certainly appears as if humanity has simply grown numb to the beauty in life and just wants to look at the awful proof of mans barbarism.
Those type of photos have been winning Pulitzers for eons. They touch people in ways a shot of a perfect landscape or sunrise cannot. They bring the tragedy home and push people into action. Even the photographer is not immune to the effects of it.
http://i6.***BLOCKED***/albums/y212/quickmelt1028/pulitzer1.jpg
That won the Pulitzer in 1994. The photographer, Kevin Carter, committed suicide that same year in no small part to the guilt he felt over having left that child there to die, with an aid station only a kilometer or two away.
There are other stunning photos that usually play on the juxtaposition of beauty surrounded by everything but beauty. Some of the most striking landscape shots I've ever seen were of bristlecone pines growing out of a barren rock cliff at altitude.
Pretty much everyone knows this one:
The only reason that her portrait is special is because she's got stunning eyes, and is in a war torn refugee camp, having fled from Afghanistan. Would it have made the cover of Nat Geo if she wasn't in those circumstances? Doubtful.