NFL GMs are for Sure Still Using the Trade Value Chart

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,514
Reaction score
49,305
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
As I've done for the last several years, I looked at every trade in last years draft and compared it to the trade value chart.

It's unbelievably consistent and reliable.
Crazy even

I looked at all 26 trades involving only draft picks (not players) in the 2019 draft.

Just simply using the standard Trade Value Chart, I found the correlation to almost always be at 95-100%
23 of 26 trades were almost dead on and the other 3 were close enough.
Pretty amazing

Ironically, one of the worst correlations of the 26 was when Dallas traded up to grab our center at pick 146. Not saying it was not worth it, but by the books, we overpaid more than almost any other 2019 trade. If you like the player though, I have no real issue.

When future picks were involved the match was always fixed by assuming GMs devalue future picks by about 55% each year forward. It works out to about 1 round of devaluation each year forward.
The matches were usually almost exact...98-100%


The bottom line is if you do a mock or prose a trade in the draft zone, just know that in real life, the GMs stick to that chart almost to a silly extent.

No special discounts or special treatment to move from 20 to 10, for example, to "get a QB".
The facts say that is not true based on the last draft and the chart match.
If the proposed trade does not follow the chart to within 90% or so, it is not realistic at all.
The lone exception I've seen in the 1st round in the last 10 years was in 2016 at the very top of the draft. Those "only" matched at 80-87%

Here's the chart
https://BAN-INCOMING-IN-3-2-1/draftchart.php

Go Cowboys
:flagwave:
 
Last edited:
It's part of the "analytics" that fans are recently raving over.

They just didn't realize it.

Jerry even had his own chart made up that reflects that Jerry Tax (Jerry consistently getting beat in trades).
 
It's part of the "analytics" that fans are recently raving over.

They just didn't realize it.

Jerry even had his own chart made up that reflects that Jerry Tax (Jerry consistently getting beat in trades).
:laugh:

It is amazing though.
I could list every trade, and the matches are so predictable....even when future picks are used.

But come a draft time when all start doing mocks, some of the ones here with trades are quite comical. Somehow, they always have Jerry seriously fleecing the other GMs.
:cool:
 
It's part of the "analytics" that fans are recently raving over.

They just didn't realize it.

Jerry even had his own chart made up that reflects that Jerry Tax (Jerry consistently getting beat in trades).

It's really nuts how they are glued to the charts. If you know the trade partners, then you figure out the trade scenarios give or take a throw in 7th. This is true even with future picks.
Throw in players and it gets tougher.
  1. SF trades 13 and 245 (1151) for TBs 14 and 117 (1160)…99.2% accuracy
  2. NE trade 23 (760) for LAC's 37 and 71 (765)…99,3% accuracy
  3. MN traded 25 (720) for SF's 31, 117, and 176 (682)….94.7%
  4. MIA traded 26 (700) for GB's 30 and 136 (658)….94%
  5. CLE traded 41 (490 ) for IND's 44 and 160 (488)….99.5%
  6. NYJ traded 48 (420) for SEA's 59 and 101 (406).96.7%
  7. in 2019: NO traded 2019 48 and 116 (482) for MIA's 2019 pks 62 and 202 and a 2020 2nd --valued as a 2019 mid 3rd, or 80th. (485)….99%
  8. BAL traded 60 and 129 (343) for NE's 71 and 98 (343)100% exact
  9. SEA trade 64 (270) for CAR's 69 and 148 (277)….97.4%
  10. CLE traded 74 and 244 (221) for NO's 88 and 2021 3rd--value as 2020 mid 4th or 112 (220)….99.5%
  11. IND traded 75 and 197 (228) for Det's 85, 149, 182 (216)94.7%
  12. in 2019: DEN traded 2019 10th (1300) for PIT's 2019 20th and 52nd and a 2020 3rd--value mid 2019 4th or pk112 (total value 1300)….100%
  13. LV traded 91 and 159 (164.8) for NE's 100, 139 and 172 (160.1).97%
  14. NYJ traded 101 (96) for NE's 125, 129 and a 2021 6th--value as 2020 mid 7th or 228 w/ comps (92.6)96.4% match
  15. MIN traded 105 ( 84) for NO's 130, 169, 203, 244 (79)94%
  16. DET traded 109 (76) for LV's 121 and 172 (75.6)…99.5%
  17. in 2019: CHI traded 87, 162 and a 2020 4th--value as mid 2019 5th 144th (217) for NE's 2019 73 and 205 (235 )….92.3% match
  18. HOU traded 111 (72) for MIA's 136 and 141 (73.5 )98%
  19. LAR traded 125 (46th) for HOU's 136th, 248th 250th (40)87%
  20. PHI trade 146th (33) for DAL's 164 and 2021 5th--value at 2020 mid 6th or 195th w/ comp (41)….…80.4%
  21. PHI trade 164th (27) for MIA's 173 and 227 (26)…96.3%
  22. PHI traded 173 and 227 (26) for CHI's 196, 200, 233 (28.5)….91.2%
  23. IND trade 182 (19.6) for NE's 212 and 213 (14.8)75.5%
  24. MIN traded 201 and 219 (16.8) for BAL's 225 and 2021 5th--valued at 2020 6th or approx 195th w/ comps (17.3)97%
  25. HOU traded 2020 7th, pick 240 (2.4) for NO's 2021 6th (valued at 2020 mid 7th or 228+ w/ comps (1.4)…standard practice. minimal value
  26. MIA traded 2020 7th, pick 251 for NO's 2021 6th (valued at 2020 mid 7th or 228+ w/ comps…standard practice. minimal value
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,971
Messages
13,907,966
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top