Primetime42
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,494
- Reaction score
- 837
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...cam-newton-ncaa-eligible/index.html?eref=sihp
The bigger issue here of course is a man basically pimping out his own son for easy cash, but the fact Dez Bryant lost an entire year of eligibility for saying he didn't know somebody is asinine by comparison.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad things worked out the way they did, because he likely would not be a Cowboy if his stock hadn't taken such a nosedive, but he has every right to be irate with this.
Also, by doing the right thing based on the available evidence, the NCAA has opened a gaping loophole in its own enforcement process. Any player who is for sale during his recruitment now may shift blame to a parent, an uncle or a crooked family friend and say, "Well, you let Cam Newton play." USC tailback Dillon Baxter should be furious. His school held him out of a game for receiving a golf cart ride from an agent. Any player who has had to sit a game because someone considered by the NCAA to be a booster or agent bought lunch has a legitimate beef. My guess is that if Auburn isn't in a position to win the national title, the NCAA would have suspended Newton for a game or two, but the stakes were just too big -- especially considering undefeated Auburn got jobbed out of playing for the national title by the BCS system only six years ago.
How big is the loophole? Ask Sonny Vaccaro, the basketball power-broker. "The NCAA just gave cover to every middle man in the country," Vaccaro told Dan Wetzel of Yahoo! Sports. "The kids never know. In all my years, I've never heard of a kid being involved in the negotiation. You think they ask? Of course not. Their mom asks. Their coach asks. Their cousin asks. This is crazy."
It would be easy to criticize the NCAA for ripping out its own teeth, but the hearts of the reinstatement staff were in the correct place. Given the available facts, the younger Newton was a pawn in all this, and he shouldn't be punished for the sins of his father. The NCAA release said no evidence exists to indicate Cam Newton knew of the scheme. Even if he did, could he have stopped it? Think back to when you were Newton's age. Could you have defied your father? Some might have, but most people wouldn't have.
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...newton-ncaa-eligible/index.html#ixzz16uCUCeGr
The bigger issue here of course is a man basically pimping out his own son for easy cash, but the fact Dez Bryant lost an entire year of eligibility for saying he didn't know somebody is asinine by comparison.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad things worked out the way they did, because he likely would not be a Cowboy if his stock hadn't taken such a nosedive, but he has every right to be irate with this.