PFN "I can do better than Jerry" mock

[Sydla]

Maybe I can't.

16 - JOK, LB/S, ND (traded with Cards got 16 and 49)
44 - Stokes, CB, UGA
49 - Cox, LB, LSU
75 - Holland, S, UO
99 - Smith, OT, ECU
115 - Brown, DT, A&M
179 - Hainsey, OG, ND
192 - Robinson, DE, FSU
227 - Herring, DE/LB, UGA
238 - Lenoir, CB, UO

Double dipped three schools - ND, UGA and UO.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

Maybe I can't.

16 - JOK, LB/S, ND (traded with Cards got 16 and 49)
44 - Stokes, CB, UGA
49 - Cox, LB, LSU
75 - Holland, S, UO
99 - Smith, OT, ECU
115 - Brown, DT, A&M
179 - Hainsey, OG, ND
192 - Robinson, DE, FSU
227 - Herring, DE/LB, UGA
238 - Lenoir, CB, UO

Double dipped three schools - ND, UGA and UO.

I think I told someone the other say I view Holland as a Top 60-75 prospect so where you have him makes sense to me.

 

[JBS]

10. Surtain
44. Grant
59. Tryon (75+99)
97. Tuipolotu (115+ 2022 4th)
123. Forsythe

 

[Zekeats]

I think I told someone the other say I view Holland as a Top 60-75 prospect so where you have him makes sense to me.

Your view is off. He's a top 50 guy no way he's there for our 3rd rounder. I know he's there in the PFN mock but he won't be there on draft day.

 

[fivetwos]

Your view is off. He's a top 50 guy no way he's there for our 3rd rounder. I know he's there in the PFN mock but he won't be there on draft day.

I tend to agree there. Although I think Moehrig is a cut above the rest for now, I do think someone will fall in love with Holland and he is a bona-fide 2nd round pick.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

Your view is off. He's a top 50 guy no way he's there for our 3rd rounder. I know he's there in the PFN mock but he won't be there on draft day.

Lol, shut the hell up.

 

[Zekeats]

Lol, shut the hell up.

I still take him in the 3rd though.

 

[Adiba1977]

Maybe I can't.

16 - JOK, LB/S, ND (traded with Cards got 16 and 49)
44 - Stokes, CB, UGA
49 - Cox, LB, LSU
75 - Holland, S, UO
99 - Smith, OT, ECU
115 - Brown, DT, A&M
179 - Hainsey, OG, ND
192 - Robinson, DE, FSU
227 - Herring, DE/LB, UGA
238 - Lenoir, CB, UO

Double dipped three schools - ND, UGA and UO.

No way draft all d??? Need speed wr. Rb and probably late round qb

 

[Sydla]

No way draft all d??? Need speed wr. Rb and probably late round qb

We don't "need" a speed WR. We don't "need" a RB. And if they want to blow a late round pick on a QB have fun but it's a waste of a pick.

And it wasn't all D. I took an OT and an OG.

 

[Adiba1977]

We don't "need" a speed WR. We don't "need" a RB. And if they want to blow a late round pick on a QB have fun but it's a waste of a pick.

And it wasn't all D. I took an OT and an OG.

We need speed wr and return specialist. Unless you want pollard to keep messing up kick returns.

 

[Sydla]

We need speed wr and return specialist. Unless you want pollard to keep messing up kick returns.

Why do we need a speed WR? Offense seems to be just fine with what we have.

If you want to throw a late round pick at a return guy, have at it. You have Lamb for punt returns and with the way the league is, there aren't a lot of kick returns anyway.

 

[gimmesix]

Maybe I can't.

16 - JOK, LB/S, ND (traded with Cards got 16 and 49)
44 - Stokes, CB, UGA
49 - Cox, LB, LSU
75 - Holland, S, UO
99 - Smith, OT, ECU
115 - Brown, DT, A&M
179 - Hainsey, OG, ND
192 - Robinson, DE, FSU
227 - Herring, DE/LB, UGA
238 - Lenoir, CB, UO

Double dipped three schools - ND, UGA and UO.

Doesn't give me my DT fix. I'm dissatisfied. Give me Barmore at 16 instead of JOK and I'll go along with it and be a happy camper. Every area of defense would be addressed within the first three rounds. Brown's not my favorite of the NTs (I like McNeil, Shelvin and Wilson better), but I assume they were gone.

 

[AsthmaField]

Maybe I can't.

16 - JOK, LB/S, ND (traded with Cards got 16 and 49)
44 - Stokes, CB, UGA
49 - Cox, LB, LSU
75 - Holland, S, UO
99 - Smith, OT, ECU
115 - Brown, DT, A&M
179 - Hainsey, OG, ND
192 - Robinson, DE, FSU
227 - Herring, DE/LB, UGA
238 - Lenoir, CB, UO

Double dipped three schools - ND, UGA and UO.

Switch out Cox for a DT and I’d be all aboard that train.

 

[AsthmaField]

Doesn't give me my DT fix. I'm dissatisfied. Give me Barmore at 16 instead of JOK and I'll go along with it and be a happy camper. Every area of defense would be addressed within the first three rounds. Brown's not my favorite of the NTs (I like McNeil, Shelvin and Wilson better), but I assume they were gone.

Naw man, JOK would be a weapon on defense. Just get rid of Cox and take McNeil or Nixon at 49.

That would be a hell of a draft.

 

[gimmesix]

Naw man, JOK would be a weapon on defense. Just get rid of Cox and take McNeil or Nixon at 49.

That would be a hell of a draft.

I might could buy into that. Although I really like McNeil, I would think we'd need to go with more of a 3-tech type if we're taking Brown. Don't need two players considered to be run-down NTs.

So Nixon would be the better choice or we'd need to switch out Brown with a 3-tech type. I really like McNeill and have cooled some on Nixon, so I'd probably lean that direction. I don't know if a player like Togiai would be there at the point this mock has us drafting Brown. Maybe Marvin Wilson would, and if injury is what held him back this year, he could end up being a three-down player. Another option might be Milton Williams at that point because 115 is about where I think he should be taken.

 

[JD_KaPow]

We need speed wr and return specialist. Unless you want pollard to keep messing up kick returns.

You are really stretching the meaning of the word "need."

 

[darthseinfeld]

I think I told someone the other say I view Holland as a Top 60-75 prospect so where you have him makes sense to me.

I told my date that the other night

 

[darthseinfeld]

We don't "need" a speed WR. We don't "need" a RB. And if they want to blow a late round pick on a QB have fun but it's a waste of a pick.

And it wasn't all D. I took an OT and an OG.

If there is a #4 type niche guy on day 3, that would be a solid get. However the guy they are looking at doesnt return kicks

 

[AsthmaField]

I might could buy into that. Although I really like McNeil, I would think we'd need to go with more of a 3-tech type if we're taking Brown. Don't need two players considered to be run-down NTs.

So Nixon would be the better choice or we'd need to switch out Brown with a 3-tech type. I really like McNeill and have cooled some on Nixon, so I'd probably lean that direction. I don't know if a player like Togiai would be there at the point this mock has us drafting Brown. Maybe Marvin Wilson would, and if injury is what held him back this year, he could end up being a three-down player. Another option might be Milton Williams at that point because 115 is about where I think he should be taken.

Yeah, McNeil has really grown on me through the pre draft process.