PFT: Tuna's Boiman Silence is Deafening

I like making fun of Florio whenever I can. It's pretty easy.

Seriously, if Parcells wasn't there for the Keyshawn press conference, a guy who was just as controversial as Owens when he came to Dallas, what's the big difference?

Rich..........
calling Florio a "mediot" is an insult to mediots.
 
I can't believe they wrote a similar article to their T.O. one.

Unbelievable.

Do these guys think Bouman (correct spelling) is that big of a FA signing for Parcells to show up???
 
thats the funniest thing i've seen in a long time. you have got to email that to them.
 
Boiman is definitely bound to destroy team chemistry now! Boiman vs Parcells has officially begun!



:laugh2:
 
BrAinPaiNt said:
Not sure which is funnier, the remake of the article or people thinking it is real.

Definitely the latter. Both are funny, though.

Frickin' Boiman.
 
What fooled me is I thought you guys were playing right along..I did not even think that you all took it for real but were trying to add to the sarcasm:laugh2:
 
trickblue said:
That was some funny stuff... :D


Funny -- but he should not be fooling us old folk like that--takes us to long to catch on:mad:
 
Living in Florida I'm not clued in on the local atmospherics there in Dallas but what's PFT's problem with the Cowboys? First noticed an article by them claiming Cowboy lockerroom unhappy with TO signing, that Parcells not on board, etc., etc., etc., pointing out he wasn't at TO PC. Now another article that Parcell's not involved in Boiman signing indicative he unhappy with it, etc., etc. I think signing of Boiman is good for Cowboys; brings ST talent & depth at all 3 LB positions. Is PFT trying stir up something for its readers? Has there been any indication Parcells less then happy so far this offseason? Clue me in. Thanks.
 
People are reading way too much into the TO/Parcells thing. Parcells was the one who had lunch with Drew Rosenhouse so why would he be against TO. I think that post is funny and proves a a good point
 
sago1 said:
Living in Florida I'm not clued in on the local atmospherics there in Dallas but what's PFT's problem with the Cowboys? First noticed an article by them claiming Cowboy lockerroom unhappy with TO signing, that Parcells not on board, etc., etc., etc., pointing out he wasn't at TO PC. Now another article that Parcell's not involved in Boiman signing indicative he unhappy with it, etc., etc. I think signing of Boiman is good for Cowboys; brings ST talent & depth at all 3 LB positions. Is PFT trying stir up something for its readers? Has there been any indication Parcells less then happy so far this offseason? Clue me in. Thanks.


Are you serious?

It's called sarcasm.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,285
Messages
13,863,422
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top