Props on the lack of penalties...

tskyler

Active Member
Messages
218
Reaction score
28
Shocked no one has jumped in to point out how much better we did on the penalties tonite. I felt very good about that.

Skyler
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
tskyler;2277528 said:
Shocked no one has jumped in to point out how much better we did on the penalties tonite. I felt very good about that.

Skyler

Well so much for Wade CREAMPUFF.

Like I said last week-you can't judge teams after only TWO games, b/c they generally improve from week to week all the way to the end.
 

Arch Stanton

it was the grave marked unknown right beside
Messages
6,474
Reaction score
0
7 for 54 yards is better, but nothing to cheer about.
 

tskyler

Active Member
Messages
218
Reaction score
28
Sorry, I'm just confused as to where the seven for 54 came from. I saw a couple of blocks to back. Not good but not worrysome. A hold. We will always have one or two of these. I also saw an offsides. Again, one or two is to be expected. Looked like a pretty reasonable game to me penalty wise. I'm not looking for perfection. It just felt like a good outing.
 

tskyler

Active Member
Messages
218
Reaction score
28
Ah... totally forgot about the bs grounding when it looked like the receiver ran the wrong route.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
tskyler;2277583 said:
Sorry, I'm just confused as to where the seven for 54 came from.

We had three special teams penalties, two intentional grounding penalties on Romo and two penalties for 6 yards on the Packers' garbage-time touchdown drive.
 
Top