darthseinfeld
Groupthink Guru
- Messages
- 33,687
- Reaction score
- 38,284
I see alot clamoring for this guy. What do you see in him that makes you think he should be #26
I don't.I see alot clamoring for this guy. What do you see in him that makes you think he should be #26
Exactly.........happens every offseasonOnly reason I can see guys making a claim for him at 26 is that our DTs have sucked for the longest and we Hankins is a short-term solution.
The last DT we drafted in the first round was Pritchett in 91 smh
Pro:I see alot clamoring for this guy. What do you see in him that makes you think he should be #26
Nothing. That is way to high for my taste.I see alot clamoring for this guy. What do you see in him that makes you think he should be #26
I see some Payne in his game. The guy moves real well for a man of his size. I think he could develop into a pocket mover.I see alot clamoring for this guy. What do you see in him that makes you think he should be #26
Is he better than Benton in your eyes. Benton is smaller, but he plays with as much if not more power and is more consistent. Benton is also probably a 3 down player right now, where Smith needs to develop before he is on the field on 3rd downsPowerful 1 tech with athleticism to be a pass rush threat imo. I see him similar to Payne/Tomlinson......same guys this board was begging for just a few months ago
wow, I didn't realize it was that far back into the history....amazingly badOnly reason I can see guys making a claim for him at 26 is that our DTs have sucked for the longest and we Hankins is a short-term solution.
The last DT we drafted in the first round was Pritchett in 91 smh
People listen to Dane when it's convenient apparentlySo Brugler says late 1/early 2, then on this thread I see 2nd, 3rd, 5th or 7th.
Interesting.