dwmyers
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,373
- Reaction score
- 522
If you guys haven't been reading the blog "Smart Football", you're not nearly as good at Xs and Os as you pretend to be.
This is the best analysis of the Gruden-Newton video I've seen.
http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/did-cam-newton-flunk-the-jon-gruden-test
Excerpt:
This is the best analysis of the Gruden-Newton video I've seen.
http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/did-cam-newton-flunk-the-jon-gruden-test
Excerpt:
The argument is that Newton just passes on the long verbiage call and, in not answering, fails the question. Now, it’s clear that Newton’s offense in college was not as complicated as what the pros do, I think the conclusion that Cam is automatically unfit is unfair. He didn’t forget his own plays; he says they did not have it in his offense because everything had to be done from the no-huddle. He says “36″ might be the play name, and they call 36 and up and go. (For what it’s worth, in his book Finding the Winning Edge, put out in 1997, Bill Walsh said the future of football was in no-huddle offenses where the plays were called with single words.)

DAL @ PHI
LAR
IND
CAR