cowboyjoe12
Member
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 31
Still, despite his age and injury history, teams will still be interested in Lawrence because of what he brings on the field and to the locker room. There’s no denying Lawrence was one of the most essential on and off-field leaders during his time as a Cowboy, and numerous players and coaches have raved about his leadership ability.Lawrence was named to the Pro Bowl in 2022 and 2023, totaling 107 total pressures, 82 QB hurries, and 11 sacks over those two years. In his later years, Lawrence’s best asset has been his ability to play the run as an edge defender. 2023 was arguably the best season of his career doing just that, as Pro Football Focus graded the 11-year pro as the second-best run defender in football with a 92.2 grade.
If stats mean anything, then Lawrence gets a new contract along with Oso.
Lawrence also contributes strongly in run defense and help on the run has improved for Oso.
Still, despite his age and injury history, teams will still be interested in Lawrence because of what he brings on the field and to the locker room. There’s no denying Lawrence was one of the most essential on and off-field leaders during his time as a Cowboy, and numerous players and coaches have raved about his leadership ability.
When looking for a contract projection, two deals signed by veterans last offseason may serve as a good benchmark. Last spring, then 33-year-old Denico Autry and 30-year-old Arik Armstead signed multi-year deals worth at least $10M annually. Autry, the older of the two, signed a two-year, $20M contract with the Houston Texans, while Armstead inked a three-year, $43.5M deal with the Jacksonville Jaguars.
https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/202...efensive-end-demarcus-lawrence-contract-value
You evaluate on the play on the field and status of that specific player. He still matches up strongly with opponents. He is top shelf in play as well as leadership. That is strength as to team play...and not stat count or popularity. One is a fool to sell naively cost effectively when management still fills the need.I've never been a Dlaw hater, and appreciate what he brings to the field.
That said, you either let guys go a little too soon or too late. I think we should probably part ways. Of course when I use logic like this its assuming we'd better use the cap elsewhere. That's clearly a poor assumption though, as it's likely we'd do nothing with that cap savings.
it'll be a spree, it just won't be on players that cost over 2.5 millionYes. If the Cowboys really wanted to they could go on a shopping spree this offseason.
But guess what? They don't want to. So get it out of your head.
hey now I like this!!!!! So if we continue to hear them saying they don't have the money we should think of this, if we see them spend on bottom barrel guys, this is the reason?????? I'm cool with this!Sure, if you think managing the CAP is a one year exercise, by all means go crazy and clear $100 million. I do not have a problem managing the CAP over 3 or 4 years. And what does it matter if they do clear $100 million. At best they will re-sign the players they have but they need to change philosophy to use that space to pay any significant free agents.
No doubt they will going into 2025 NFL season with limited CAP space and wait to do anything to clear CAP space. Then we'll see status quo again.
And btw, I fully support not restructuring Dak's contract this year event though his CAP hit is $90 million. If Dak has another off year in 2025, I want to be able to shed him and his enormous, unjustified salary in 2026 so he is off my books in 2027. That's when we start the rebuild.
You evaluate on the play on the field and status of that specific player. He still matches up strongly with opponents. He is top shelf in play as well as leadership. That is strength as to team play...and not stat count or popularity. One is a fool to sell naively cost effectively when management still fills the need.
I am speaking for myself, not for Jerry and Stephen. I think they will restructure Dak again making it even more difficult to get rid of him in 2026.hey now I like this!!!!! So if we continue to hear them saying they don't have the money we should think of this, if we see them spend on bottom barrel guys, this is the reason?????? I'm cool with this!