KingTuna
New Member
- Messages
- 1,381
- Reaction score
- 0
All of these "bench Bledsoe" or start Romo/Henson posts are getting soooo old...
Can't you wait until at least week 8 to start clamoring for a QB change?
What's really funny to me is that IF the First team offense comes out and commands the field and scores points Monday night in PRE-SEASON game #2 then all of these same posters will be saying... "Wow, BP really made the right decision to bring in Bledsoe, BUT it's just a pre-season game"...
I predict the following double standard to be in full play.
"Bledsoe and the first team offense did NOTperform well in PRE SEASON game #1 after ONE quarter so bringing in Bledsoe was a mistake by BP and Romo/Henson should be starting NOW"
Double standard:
"Bledsoe and the first team performed GREAT in PRE SEASON game #2 against the Seahawks BUT, That is just the pre-season and does not mean anything!"
It's clear to me that if you never liked the Bledsoe signing then these scenarios are the first posts out there after the game and the following week.
While you can certainly continue posting this way and proving my theory correct, I rather suggest you wait until the games really count and Bledsoe/first team offense get 4 FULL quarters per game to establish their chemistry and if you REALLY want to be daring (err I mean FAIR) give them at least 4 games to show what they can do.
While I know this is an absurd request for anti-Bledsoe posters to objectively consider and attempt to try, this will at least add credibility to your "Start Romo/Henson" posts.
Or... It may just make them go away all together....(Ie: Bledsoe ACTUALLY playing well!!)
:starspin :starspin :starspin
Can't you wait until at least week 8 to start clamoring for a QB change?
What's really funny to me is that IF the First team offense comes out and commands the field and scores points Monday night in PRE-SEASON game #2 then all of these same posters will be saying... "Wow, BP really made the right decision to bring in Bledsoe, BUT it's just a pre-season game"...
I predict the following double standard to be in full play.
"Bledsoe and the first team offense did NOTperform well in PRE SEASON game #1 after ONE quarter so bringing in Bledsoe was a mistake by BP and Romo/Henson should be starting NOW"
Double standard:
"Bledsoe and the first team performed GREAT in PRE SEASON game #2 against the Seahawks BUT, That is just the pre-season and does not mean anything!"
It's clear to me that if you never liked the Bledsoe signing then these scenarios are the first posts out there after the game and the following week.
While you can certainly continue posting this way and proving my theory correct, I rather suggest you wait until the games really count and Bledsoe/first team offense get 4 FULL quarters per game to establish their chemistry and if you REALLY want to be daring (err I mean FAIR) give them at least 4 games to show what they can do.
While I know this is an absurd request for anti-Bledsoe posters to objectively consider and attempt to try, this will at least add credibility to your "Start Romo/Henson" posts.
Or... It may just make them go away all together....(Ie: Bledsoe ACTUALLY playing well!!)
:starspin :starspin :starspin
