The real reason we lost yesterday

StarAmongStars

New Member
Messages
509
Reaction score
0
Forget dogging Romo or our defense.....there is 2 words why we lost yesterday: Scott Shanle

He has intimate knowledge of our team and we did not account for him like we should have. Star players need to be accounted for every snap of the football and Shanle went Merriman on us wreaking havoc all night and has been the cornerstone of the Saints defense all season long.

From a backup in Dallas, to a probowler in New Orleans.

Once again, our front office made a great offseason move! :banghead:
 
StarAmongStars;1227379 said:
Forget dogging Romo or our defense.....there is 2 words why we lost yesterday: Scott Shanle

He has intimate knowledge of our team and we did not account for him like we should have. Star players need to be accounted for every snap of the football and Shanle went Merriman on us wreaking havoc all night and has been the cornerstone of the Saints defense all season long.

From a backup in Dallas, to a probowler in New Orleans.

Once again, our front office made a great offseason move! :banghead:


No, I disagree...if Parcells would have went with Bledsoe instead of Romo, the Cowboys would have won 43 to 14...

Bad move by Parcells...very bad move...

:cool:
 
5Stars;1227387 said:
No, I disagree...if Parcells would have went with Bledsoe instead of Romo, the Cowboys would have won 43 to 14...

Bad move by Parcells...very bad move...

:cool:
:hammer:
 
StarAmongStars;1227379 said:
Forget dogging Romo or our defense.....there is 2 words why we lost yesterday: Scott Shanle

He has intimate knowledge of our team and we did not account for him like we should have. Star players need to be accounted for every snap of the football and Shanle went Merriman on us wreaking havoc all night and has been the cornerstone of the Saints defense all season long.

From a backup in Dallas, to a probowler in New Orleans.

Once again, our front office made a great offseason move! :banghead:

Nors

There really is no other explanation
 
5Stars;1227387 said:
No, I disagree...if Parcells would have went with Bledsoe instead of Romo, the Cowboys would have won 43 to 14...

Bad move by Parcells...very bad move...

:cool:

I don't know if you are being serious or not, but I really don't think playing Bledsoe would have mattered.....Shanle and Fujita were on a mission last night to prove themselves and both came up big.
 
StarAmongStars;1227396 said:
I don't know if you are being serious or not, but I really don't think playing Bledsoe would have mattered.....Shanle and Fujita were on a mission last night to prove themselves and both came up big.


Not....
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,066
Messages
13,846,892
Members
23,786
Latest member
waycooljr
Back
Top